Re: Bucket policies in Luminous

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hmm, I have to admit to major user error here - my .s3cfg file was pointing at our jewel cluster, not luminous - no wonder the bucket policy didn't work. A bit embarrassing...

Having corrected that, I can now set bucket policies without problem - thanks for the update!

If I set a policy with an action of "s3:PutObject" then my permitted user can add files to the bucket.

I'm a bit surprised that allowing "s3:GetObject" doesn't seem to permit reading the same object back out again. Even using a wildcard for the action, I haven't been able to fetch an object or read bucket contents. Admittedly I have no experience with AWS bucket policies so I could be doing something dumb...

Thanks,

Graham

On 07/17/2017 06:33 PM, Graham Allan wrote:
Thanks for the update. I saw there was a set of new 12.1.1 packages today so I updated to these (appears to contain the update below), rather than build my own radosgw.

I'm not sure what changed; I don't get a crash now but I don't seem able to set any policy now.

my sample policy:

% cat s3policy
{
   "Version": "2012-10-17",
   "Statement": [
     {
       "Effect": "Allow",
       "Principal": {"AWS": ["arn:aws:iam:::user/gta2"]},
       "Action": "s3:ListBucket",
       "Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::gta/*"]
     }
   ]
}

but...

% s3cmd setpolicy s3policy s3://gta
ERROR: S3 error: 400 (InvalidArgument)

I have "debug rgw = 20" but nothing revealing in the logs.

Do you see anything obviously wrong in my policy file?

Thanks,

Graham

On 07/12/2017 11:27 PM, Pritha Srivastava wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam C. Emerson" <aemerson@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Graham Allan" <gta@xxxxxxx>
Cc: "Ceph Users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 1:23:27 AM
Subject: Re:  Bucket policies in Luminous

Graham Allan Wrote:
I thought I'd try out the new bucket policy support in Luminous. My goal
was simply to permit access on a bucket to another user.
[snip]
Thanks for any ideas,

It's probably the 'blank' tenant. I'll make up a test case to exercise
this and come up with a patch for it. Sorry about the trouble.


The fix in this PR: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/15997 should help.

Thanks,
Pritha

--
Senior Software Engineer           Red Hat Storage, Ann Arbor, MI, US
IRC: Aemerson@{RedHat, OFTC}
0x80F7544B90EDBFB9 E707 86BA 0C1B 62CC 152C  7C12 80F7 544B 90ED BFB9
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



--
Graham Allan
Minnesota Supercomputing Institute - gta@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux