Pg inactive when back filling?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ceph users,

I found that some pg are inactive after I added some osds and PGs.

ceph pg dump_stuck inactive:

PG_STAT STATE                                             UP      UP_PRIMARY ACTING ACTING_PRIMARY 
10.9b     undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling+peered   [8,9]          8    [3]              3 
10.167    undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling+peered   [2,0]          2    [3]              3 
10.1c3    undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling+peered   [9,5]          9    [1]              1 
10.15c  undersized+degraded+remapped+backfill_wait+peered   [0,2]          0    [6]              6 
10.187  undersized+degraded+remapped+backfill_wait+peered   [9,5]          9    [6]              6 
10.1bb    undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling+peered   [0,3]          0    [3]              3 
10.1f7    undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling+peered   [2,1]          2    [0]              0 
10.87   undersized+degraded+remapped+backfill_wait+peered   [0,3]          0    [6]              6 
10.1ae    undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling+peered   [8,3]          8    [0]              0 
10.e2     undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling+peered   [5,8]          5    [1]              1 
10.17e  undersized+degraded+remapped+backfill_wait+peered   [1,3]          1    [6]              6 
10.11c    undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling+peered   [5,3]          5    [1]              1 
10.1d2  undersized+degraded+remapped+backfill_wait+peered   [5,2]          5    [9]              9 
10.13d    undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling+peered   [3,1]          3    [0]              0 
10.1a2    undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling+peered   [5,1]          5    [1]              1 
10.153    undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling+peered   [1,8]          1    [0]              0 
10.13c    undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling+peered   [5,9]          5    [0]              0 
10.133    undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling+peered   [6,5]          6    [8]              8 
10.dc   undersized+degraded+remapped+backfill_wait+peered   [8,9]          8    [6]              6 
10.1ef    undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling+peered   [0,1]          0    [3]              3 
10.123  undersized+degraded+remapped+backfill_wait+peered   [5,8]          5    [8]              8 
8.36                                     remapped+peering [8,2,3]          8 [8,15]              8 
10.47     undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling+peered  [1,16]          1    [1]              1 

According to my understanding, undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling means pg are lack of enough replication but at least one copy is still on some osd. Shouldn't ceph be able to serve this pg from that OSD, while it is backfilling it? Or is there some thing that I need to do to activate these pg? 

This particular pool is replicated with size=2. 

Thanks!
Zhan
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux