Re: RBD journaling benchmarks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Maged Mokhtar <mmokhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> These are significant differences, to the point where it may not make sense
> to use rbd journaling / mirroring unless there is only 1 active client.

I interpreted the results as the same RBD image was being concurrently
used by two fio jobs -- which we strongly recommend against since it
will result in the exclusive-lock ping-ponging back and forth between
the two clients / jobs. Each fio RBD job should utilize its own
backing image to avoid such a scenario.

-- 
Jason
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux