On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Lenz Grimmer said: > > 1/ Stop testing filestore+btrfs for luminous onward. We've recommended > > against btrfs for a long time and are moving toward bluestore anyway. > > Searching the documentation for "btrfs" does not really give a user any > clue that the use of Btrfs is discouraged. > > Where exactly has this been recommended? As a new user, I certainly picked up on btrfs being discouraged, or not as stable as XFS. e.g. http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rados/configuration/filesystem-recommendations/?highlight=btrfs "We currently recommend XFS for production deployments. We used to recommend btrfs for testing, development, and any non-critical deployments ..." http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/start/hardware-recommendations/?highlight=btrfs "btrfs is not quite stable enough for production" > If you want to get rid of filestore on Btrfs, start a proper deprecation > process and inform users that support for it it's going to be removed in > the near future. The documentation must be updated accordingly and it > must be clearly emphasized in the release notes. But this sounds sane. Sean Purdy CV-Library Ltd _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |