Re: Radosgw versioning S3 compatible?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Martin Emrich
<martin.emrich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Correction: It’s about the Version expiration, not the versioning itself.
>
> We send this rule:
>
>
>
>       Rules: [
>
>         {
>
>           Status: 'Enabled',
>
>           Prefix: '',
>
>           NoncurrentVersionExpiration: {
>
>             NoncurrentDays: 60
>
>           },
>
>           Expiration: {
>
>             ExpiredObjectDeleteMarker: true
>
>           },
>
>           ID: 'expire-60days'
>
>         }
>
>       ]
>
>
>
> Should that be supported?
>

Currently rgw bucket lifecycle rules do not versioning.

Yehuda

>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> Von: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von
> Martin Emrich
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Juni 2017 16:13
> An: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Betreff:  Radosgw versioning S3 compatible?
>
>
>
> Hi!
>
>
>
> Is the Object Gateway S3 API supposed to be compatible with Amazon S3
> regarding versioning?
>
>
>
> Object Versioning is listed as supported in Ceph 12.1, but using the
> standard Node.js aws-sdk module (s3.putBucketVersioning()) results in
> “NotImplemented”.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Martin
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux