Re: Which one should I sacrifice: Tunables or Kernel-rbd?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



CentOS 7.3's krbd supports Jewel tunables (CRUSH_TUNABLES5) and does
not support NBD since that driver is disabled out-of-the-box. As an
alternative for NBD, the goal is to also offer LIO/TCMU starting with
Luminous and the next point release of CentOS (or a vanilla >=4.12-ish
kernel).

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Massimiliano Cuttini <max@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> running all server and clients a centOS release with a kernel 3.10.* I'm
> facing this choiche:
>
> sacrifice TUNABLES and downgrade all the cluster to
> CEPH_FEATURE_CRUSH_TUNABLES3 (which should be the right profile for jewel on
> old kernel 3.10)
> sacrifice KERNEL RBD and map Ceph by NBD
>
> Which one should I sacrifice? And why?
> Let me know your througth, pro & cons.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Max
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>



-- 
Jason
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux