Re: Mon Create currently at the state of probing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David,

 

SUCCESS!! Thank you so much!

 

I rebuilt the node because I could not install Jewel over the remnants of Kraken.

So, while I did install Jewel I am not convinced that was the solution. I did something that I had not tried under the Kraken attempts that solved the problem.

 

For future_me here was the solution.

 

Removed all references to r710e from the ceph.conf on ceph-deploy node in the original deployment folder home/cephadminaccount/ceph-cluster/ceph.conf

“Ceph-deploy –overwrite-conf config push r710a r710b r710c” etc to all nodes including the ceph-deploy node so it is now in the /etc/ceph/ceph.conf

“Ceph-deploy install --release jewel r710e”

“Ceph-deploy admin r710e”

“sudo chmod +r /etc/ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring” Run on node r710e

“ceph-deploy mon create r710e”

 

Node was created but still had the very same probing errors. Ugh.

 

Then I went to home/cephadminaccount/ceph-cluster/ceph.conf and added r710e back in just the way it was before and pushed it to all nodes.

“Ceph-deploy –overwrite-conf config push r710a r710b r710c” etc

“Sudo reboot” on r710g don’t know if this was necessary. When it came up ceph -s was good. Rebooted r710e for good measure. Did not reboot r710f.

 

I am wondering if I had just pushed the ceph.conf back out in the first place, would it have solved the problem.

That is for another day.

 

-Jim

 

 

From: David Turner [mailto:drakonstein@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 4:19 PM
To: Jim Forde <jimf@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Mon Create currently at the state of probing

 

You can specify an option in ceph-deploy to tell it which release of ceph to install, jewel, kraken, hammer, etc.  `ceph-deploy --release jewel` would pin the command to using jewel instead of kraken.

 

While running a mixed environment is supported, it should always be tested before assuming it will work for you in production.  The Mons are quick enough to upgrade, I always do them together.  Following I upgrade half of my OSDs in a test environment and leave it there for a couple weeks (or until adequate testing is done) before upgrading the remaining OSDs and again waiting until the testing is done, I would probably do the MDS before the OSDs, but don't usually think about that since I don't have them in a production environment.  Lastly I would test upgrading the clients (vm hosts, RGW, kernel clients, etc) and test this state the most thoroughly.  In production I haven't had to worry about an upgrade taking longer than a few hours with over 60 OSD nodes, 5 mons, and a dozen clients.  I just don't see a need to run in a mixed environment in production, even if it is supported.

 

Back to your problem with adding in the mon.  Do your existing mons know about the third mon, or have you removed it from their running config?  It might be worth double checking their config file and restarting the daemons after you know they will pick up the correct settings.  It's hard for me to help with this part as I've been lucky enough not to have any problems with the docs online for this when it's come up.  I've replaced 5 mons without any issues.  I didn't use ceph-deploy, except to install the packages, though and did the manual steps for it.

 

Hopefully adding the mon back on Jewel fixes the issue.  That would be the easiest outcome.  I don't know that the Ceph team has tested adding upgraded mons to an old quorum.

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 4:52 PM Jim Forde <jimf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

David,

Thanks for the reply.

 

The scenario:

Monitor node fails for whatever reason, Bad blocks in HD, or Motherboard fail, whatever.

 

Procedure:

Remove the monitor from the cluster, replace hardware, reinstall OS and add monitor to cluster.

 

That is exactly what I did. However, my ceph-deploy node had already been upgraded to Kraken.

The goal is to not use this as an upgrade path per se, but to recover from a failed monitor node in a cluster where there is an upgrade in progress.

 

The upgrade notes for Jewel to Kraken say you may upgrade OSDs Monitors and MSDs in any order. Perhaps I am reading too much into this, but I took it as I could proceed with the upgrade at my leisure. Making sure each node is successfully upgraded before proceeding to the next node. The implication is that I can run the cluster with different version daemons (at least during the upgrade process).

 

So that brings me to the problem at hand.

What is the correct procedure for replacing a failed Monitor Node, especially if the failed Monitor is a mon_initial_member?

Does it have to be the same version as the other Monitors in the cluster?

I do have a public network statement in the ceph.conf file.

The monitor r710e is listed as one of the mon_initial_members in ceph.conf with the correct IP address, but the error message is:
“[r710e][WARNIN] r710e is not defined in `mon initial members`”

Also “[r710e][WARNIN] monitor r710e does not exist in monmap”
Should I manually inject r710e in the monmap?

 

 

 

INFO

 

ceph.conf

cat /etc/ceph/ceph.conf
[global]
fsid = 0be01315-7928-4037-ae7c-1b0cd36e52b8
mon_initial_members = r710g,r710f,r710e
mon_host = 10.0.40.27,10.0.40.26,10.0.40.25
auth_cluster_required = cephx
auth_service_required = cephx
auth_client_required = cephx
public network = 10.0.40.0/24
cluster network = 10.0.50.0/24

[mon]
mon host = r710g,r710f,r710e
mon addr = 10.0.40.27:6789,10.0.40.26:6789,10.0.40.25:6789

 

 

monmap

monmaptool: monmap file /tmp/monmap
epoch 12
fsid 0be01315-7928-4037-ae7c-1b0cd36e52b8
last_changed 2017-06-15 08:15:10.542055
created 2016-11-17 11:42:18.481472
0: 10.0.40.26:6789/0 mon.r710f
1: 10.0.40.27:6789/0 mon.r710g

 

 

Status

ceph -s
    cluster 0be01315-7928-4037-ae7c-1b0cd36e52b8
     health HEALTH_OK
     monmap e12: 2 mons at {r710f=10.0.40.26:6789/0,r710g=10.0.40.27:6789/0}
            election epoch 252, quorum 0,1 r710f,r710g
     osdmap e7017: 16 osds: 16 up, 16 in
            flags sortbitwise,require_jewel_osds
      pgmap v14484684: 256 pgs, 1 pools, 218 GB data, 56119 objects
            661 GB used, 8188 GB / 8849 GB avail
                 256 active+clean
  client io 8135 B/s rd, 44745 B/s wr, 0 op/s rd, 5 op/s wr

 

 

PS.

 

Tried this too

ceph mon remove r710e
mon.r710e does not exist or has already been removed

 

 

 

From: David Turner [mailto:drakonstein@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 12:58 PM
To: Jim Forde <jimf@xxxxxxxxx>; Sasha Litvak <alexander.v.litvak@xxxxxxxxx>


Cc: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Mon Create currently at the state of probing

 

Question... Why are you reinstalling the node, removing the mon from the cluster, and adding it back into the cluster to upgrade to Kraken?  The upgrade path from 10.2.5 to 11.2.0 is an acceptable upgrade path.  If you just needed to reinstall the OS for some reason, then you can keep the /var/lib/ceph/mon/r710e/ folder in tact and not need to remove/re-add the mon to reisntall the OS.  Even if you upgraded from 14.04 to 16.04, this would work.  You would want to change the upstart file in the daemon's folder to systemd and make sure it works with systemctl just fine, but the daemon itself would be fine.

 

If you are hell-bent on doing this the hardest way I've ever heard of, then you might want to check out this Note from the docs for adding/removing a mon.  Since you are far enough removed from the initial ceph-deploy, you have removed r710e from your configuration and if you don't have a public network statement in your ceph.conf file... that could be your problem for the probing.

 

http://docs.ceph.com/docs/kraken/rados/deployment/ceph-deploy-mon/

"

Note

 

When adding a monitor on a host that was not in hosts initially defined with the ceph-deploy new command, a public network statement needs to be added to the ceph.conf file."

 

 

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 1:09 PM Jim Forde <jimf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

No, I don’t think Ubuntu 14.04 has it enabled by default.

Double checked.

Sudo ufw status

Status: inactive.

No other symptoms of a firewall.

 

From: Sasha Litvak [mailto:alexander.v.litvak@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2017 11:10 PM
To: Jim Forde <jimf@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Mon Create currently at the state of probing

 

Do you have firewall on on new server by any chance?

 

On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Jim Forde <jimf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I have an eight node ceph cluster running Jewel 10.2.5.

One Ceph-Deploy node. Four OSD nodes and three Monitor nodes.

Ceph-Deploy node is r710T

OSD’s are r710a, r710b, r710c, and r710d.

Mon’s are r710e, r710f, and r710g.

Name resolution is in Hosts file on each node.

 

Successfully removed Monitor r710e from cluster

Upgraded ceph-deploy node r710T to Kraken 11.2.0 (ceph -v returns 11.2.0 all other nodes are still 10.2.5)

Ceph -s is HEALTH_OK 2 mons

Rebuilt r710e with same OS (ubutnu 14.04 LTS) and same IP address.

“Ceph-deploy install –release kraken r710e” is successful with ceph -v returning 11.2.0 on node r710e

“ceph-deploy admin r710e” is successful and puts the keyring in /etc/ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring

“sudo chmod +r /etc/ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring”

 

Everything seems successful to this point.

Then I run

“ceph-deploy mon create r710e” and I get the following:

 

[r710e][DEBUG ] ********************************************************************************

[r710e][INFO  ] monitor: mon.r710e is currently at the state of probing

[r710e][INFO  ] Running command: sudo ceph --cluster=ceph --admin-daemon /var/run/ceph/ceph-mon.r710e.asok mon_status

[r710e][WARNIN] r710e is not defined in `mon initial members`

[r710e][WARNIN] monitor r710e does not exist in monmap

 

R710e is in the ‘mon initial members’.

It is in the ceph.conf file correctly (it was running before and the parameters have not changed) Public and Cluster networks are defined.

It is the same physical server with the same (but freshly installed) OS and same IP address.

Looking at the local daemon mon_status on all three monitors I see.

R710f and r710g see r710e as an “extra_probe_peers”

R710e sees r710f and r710g as “extra_probe_peers”

 

“ceph-deploy purge r710e” and “ceph-deploy purgedata r710e” with a reboot of the 2 mon’s brings cluster back to HEALTH_OK

 

Not sure what is going on. Is Ceph allergic to single node upgrades? Afraid to push the upgrade on all mon’s.

 

What I have done:

Rebuilt r710e with different hardware. Rebuilt with different OS. Rebuilt with different name and IP address. Same result.

I have also restructured the NTP server. R710T is my NTP server on the cluster. (HEALTH_OK prior to updating) I reset all Mon nodes to get time from Ubuntu default NTP sources. Same error.


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

 

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux