Re: osd_op_tp timeouts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I realized I sent this under wrong thread: here I am sending it again:

---

Hello all,

I work in the same team as Tyler here, and I can provide more info here..

The cluster is indeed an RGW cluster, with many small (100 KB) objects
similar to your use case Bryan.  But we have the blind bucket set up with
 "index_type": 1 for this particular bucket, as we wanted to avoid this
bottleneck to begin with (we didn't need listing feature)  Would the bucket
sharding still be a problem for blind buckets?

Mark, would setting logging to 20 give any insights to what threads are
doing?


Eric
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux