Thanks David for sharing your experience, appreciate it. -- Deepak From: David Turner [mailto:drakonstein@xxxxxxxxx]
I ran a cluster with 2 generations of the same vendor hardware. 24 osd supermicro and 32 osd supermicro (with faster/more RAM and CPU cores). The cluster itself ran decently well, but the load differences was drastic between the 2 types of nodes. It required
me to run the cluster with 2 separate config files for each type of node and was an utter PITA when troubleshooting bottlenecks. Ultimately I moved around hardware and created a legacy cluster on the old hardware and created a new cluster using the newer configuration. In general it was very hard to diagnose certain bottlenecks due to everything just looking so different. The primary
one I encountered was snap trimming due to deleted thousands of snapshots/day. If you aren't pushing any limits of Ceph, you will probably be fine. But if you have a really large cluster, use a lot of snapshots, or are pushing your cluster harder than the average user... Then I'd avoid mixing server configurations in a cluster. On Fri, Jun 9, 2017, 1:36 AM Deepak Naidu <dnaidu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com