Re: PG that should not be on undersized+degraded on multi datacenter Ceph cluster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Alejandro Comisario
<alejandro@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ha!
> is there ANY way of knowing when this peering maximum has been reached for a
> PG?

Not currently AFAICT.

It takes place deep in this c code that is shared between the kernel
and userspace implementations.

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/src/crush/mapper.c#L444

Whilst the kernel implementation generates some output the userspace
code does not. I'm looking at how that situation can be improved.

>
> On Jun 7, 2017 20:21, "Brad Hubbard" <bhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Peter Maloney
>> <peter.maloney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Now if only there was a log or warning seen in ceph -s that said the
>> > tries was exceeded,
>>
>> Challenge accepted.
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ceph-users mailing list
>> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Brad



-- 
Cheers,
Brad
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux