Yes -- the crashed server also mounted cephfs as a client, and also likely had active writes to the file when it crashed.
I have the max file size set to 17,592,186,044,416 -- but this file was about 5.8TB.
The likely reason for the crash? The file was mounted as a fileio backstore to LIO, which was exported as an FC lun that I had connected to an ESXi server, mapped via RDM to a guest, in which I had a dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=1M count=6000000000000 running(for several hours)
Which I think was breaking at least 3 "don't do this" rules with ceph. Once it moves into production the pieces will be separated.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Given that the MDS is running a stat on the object, and the mentionedOn Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:15 AM, John Spray <jspray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Daniel K <sathackr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Have a 20 OSD cluster -"my first ceph cluster" that has another 400 OSDs
>> enroute.
>>
>> I was "beating up" on the cluster, and had been writing to a 6TB file in
>> CephFS for several hours, during which I changed the crushmap to better
>> match my environment, generating a bunch of recovery IO. After about 5.8TB
>> written, one of the OSD(which is also a MON..soon to be rectivied) hosts
>> crashed that hat 5 OSDs on it, and after rebooting, I have this in ceph -s:
>> (The degraded/misplaced warnings are likely because the cluster hasn't
>> completed rebalancing after I changed the crushmap I assume)
>>
>
> Losing a quarter of your OSDs down while simultaneously rebalancing
> after editing your CRUSH map is a brutal thing to a Ceph cluster, and
> I would expect it to impact your client IO severely.
>
> I see that you've got 112MB/s of recovery going on, which may or may
> not be saturating some links depending on whether you're using 1gig or
> 10gig networking.
>
>> 2017-05-23 18:33:13.775924 7ff9d3230700 -1 WARNING: the following dangerous
>> and experimental features are enabled: bluestore
>> 2017-05-23 18:33:13.781732 7ff9d3230700 -1 WARNING: the following dangerous
>> and experimental features are enabled: bluestore
>> cluster e92e20ca-0fe6-4012-86cc-aa51e0466661
>> health HEALTH_WARN
>> 440 pgs backfill_wait
>> 7 pgs backfilling
>> 85 pgs degraded
>> 5 pgs recovery_wait
>> 85 pgs stuck degraded
>> 452 pgs stuck unclean
>> 77 pgs stuck undersized
>> 77 pgs undersized
>> recovery 196526/3554278 objects degraded (5.529%)
>> recovery 1690392/3554278 objects misplaced (47.559%)
>> mds0: 1 slow requests are blocked > 30 sec
>> monmap e4: 3 mons at
>> {stor-vm1=10.0.15.51:6789/0,stor-vm2=10.0.15.52:6789/0, }stor-vm3=10.0.15.53:6789/0
>> election epoch 136, quorum 0,1,2 stor-vm1,stor-vm2,stor-vm3
>> fsmap e21: 1/1/1 up {0=stor-vm4=up:active}
>> mgr active: stor-vm1 standbys: stor-vm2
>> osdmap e4655: 20 osds: 20 up, 20 in; 450 remapped pgs
>> flags sortbitwise,require_jewel_osds,require_kraken_osds
>> pgmap v192589: 1428 pgs, 5 pools, 5379 GB data, 1345 kobjects
>> 11041 GB used, 16901 GB / 27943 GB avail
>> 196526/3554278 objects degraded (5.529%)
>> 1690392/3554278 objects misplaced (47.559%)
>> 975 active+clean
>> 364 active+remapped+backfill_wait
>> 76 active+undersized+degraded+remapped+backfill_wait
>> 3 active+recovery_wait+degraded+remapped
>> 3 active+remapped+backfilling
>> 3 active+degraded+remapped+backfilling
>> 2 active+recovery_wait+degraded
>> 1 active+clean+scrubbing+deep
>> 1 active+undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling
>> recovery io 112 MB/s, 28 objects/s
>>
>>
>> Seems related to the "corrupted rbd filesystems since jewel" thread.
>>
>>
>> log entries on the MDS server:
>>
>> 2017-05-23 18:27:12.966218 7f95ed6c0700 0 log_channel(cluster) log [WRN] :
>> slow request 243.113407 seconds old, received at 2017-05-23 18:23:09.852729:
>> client_request(client.204100:5 getattr pAsLsXsFs #100000003ec 2017-05-23
>> 17:48:23.770852 RETRY=2 caller_uid=0, caller_gid=0{}) currently failed to
>> rdlock, waiting
>>
>>
>> output of ceph daemon mds.stor-vm4 objecter_requests(changes each time I run
>> it)
>
> If that changes each time you run it then it means the OSD requests
> from the MDS are happening.
>
> However, it's possible that you have multiple clients and one of them
> is stuck trying to write something back (to a PG that is not accepting
> the write (yet?)), and thereby preventing the MDS from granting a lock
> for another client.
server crash, I'm assuming it's probing the file size. Daniel, was
that crashed server also mounting CephFS as a client? (Or did you have
another client that went away?)
(Also note that if I'm interpreting it correctly, that object is the
0x3efb9f=4127647th in the file, or about 17TB worth. That doesn't look
like a journal ino to me so it must be a very large user file?)
-Greg
>
> What clients (+versions) are involved, what's the workload, what
> versions of Ceph?
>
> John
>
>> :
>> root@stor-vm4:/var/log/ceph# ceph daemon mds.stor-vm4 objecter_requests
>> {
>> "ops": [
>> {
>> "tid": 66700,
>> "pg": "1.60e95c32",
>> "osd": 4,
>> "object_id": "100000003ec.003efb9f",
>> "object_locator": "@1",
>> "target_object_id": "100000003ec.003efb9f",
>> "target_object_locator": "@1",
>> "paused": 0,
>> "used_replica": 0,
>> "precalc_pgid": 0,
>> "last_sent": "1.47461e+06s",
>> "attempts": 1,
>> "snapid": "head",
>> "snap_context": "0=[]",
>> "mtime": "1969-12-31 19:00:00.000000s",
>> "osd_ops": [
>> "stat"
>> ]
>> }
>> ],
>> "linger_ops": [],
>> "pool_ops": [],
>> "pool_stat_ops": [],
>> "statfs_ops": [],
>> "command_ops": []
>> }
>>
>>
>> I've tried restarting the mds daemon ( systemctl stop ceph-mds\*.service
>> ceph-mds.target && systemctl start ceph-mds\*.service ceph-mds.target )
>>
>>
>>
>> IO to the file that was being access when the host crashed is blocked.
>>
>>
>> Suggestions?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph. com
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph. com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com