Hi Ben! Thanks for your advice. I included the names of our gateways, but did omit the external name of the service itself. Now, everything is working again. And yes, this change is worth a note J Best regards, Ingo Von: Ben Hines [mailto:bhines@xxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Mai 2017 02:16
An: Ingo Reimann
Cc: Radoslaw Zarzynski; ceph-users
Betreff: Re: RGW 10.2.5->10.2.7 authentication fail? We used this workaround when upgrading to Kraken (which had a similar issue) >modify the zonegroup and populate the 'hostnames' array with all backend server hostnames as well as the hostname terminated by haproxy Which i'm fine with. It's definitely a change that should be noted in a more prominent release note. Without the hostname in there, ceph interpreted the hostname as a bucket name if the hostname rgw was being hit with differed from the hostname of the actual server. Pre Kraken, i didn't need that setting at all and it just worked. On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Ingo Reimann <ireimann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Radek,
are there any news about this issue? We are also stuck with 10.2.5 and can`t
update to 10.2.7.
We use a couple of radosgws that are loadbalanced behind a Keepalived/LVS.
Removal of rgw_dns_name does only help, if I address the gateway directly,
but not in general.
Best regards,
Ingo
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von
Radoslaw Zarzynski
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 11:59
An: Łukasz Jagiełło
Cc: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: RGW 10.2.5->10.2.7 authentication fail?
Hello Łukasz,
Thanks for your testing and sorry for my mistake. It looks that two commits
need to be reverted to get the previous behaviour:
The already mentioned one:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/c9445faf7fac2ccb8a05b53152c0ca16d7f4c6d0
Its dependency:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/b72fc1b820ede3cd186d887d9d30f7f91fe3764b
They have been merged in the same pull request:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11760
and form the difference visible between v10.2.5 and v10.2.6 in the matter of
"in_hosted_domain" handling:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blame/v10.2.5/src/rgw/rgw_rest.cc#L1773
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blame/v10.2.6/src/rgw/rgw_rest.cc#L1781-L1782
I'm really not sure we want to revert them. Still, it can be that they just
unhide a misconfiguration issue while fixing the problems we had with
handling of virtual hosted buckets.
Regards,
Radek
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:12 AM, Łukasz Jagiełło <jagiello.lukasz@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried today revert [1] from 10.2.7 but the problem is still there
> even without the change. Revert to 10.2.5 fix the issue instantly.
>
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/c9445faf7fac2ccb8a05b53152c0ca16d7
> f4c6d0
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Radoslaw Zarzynski
> <rzarzynski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
Ingo Reimann
Teamleiter Technik
Dunkel GmbH <https://www.dunkel.de/>
Dunkel GmbH
Philipp-Reis-Straße 2
65795 Hattersheim
Fon: +49 6190 889-100
Fax: +49 6190 889-399
eMail: support@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.Dunkel.de/ Amtsgericht Frankfurt/Main
HRB: 37971
Geschäftsführer: Axel Dunkel
Ust-ID: DE 811622001 |
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
