Re: Ceph health warn MDS failing to respond to cache pressure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Ceph health warn MDS failing to respond to cache pressure
From: Webert de Souza Lima <webert.boss@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 08:41:33 -0300
Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 69.163.254.50 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) smtp.mailfrom=ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=sender:errors-to:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post:list-archive :list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:subject:cc:to:message-id:date :from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=hhFekNbYkZF+hKf5rkGya048A3nE2cY+zN8eDfRCNmE=; b=ppvXSlRszZafA9WytTslkiZAsUcW76E58HoEYTNgx3LeJbK6rA3WQ99HVMi+1lniH5 ibEOwB/6fwIshJK2eyVjg9p42s4Ka/8j6ABcfuBPqTCCCX5ygUS5HGGk30VJcWLtZK/c 4YNPBuNbaDeq8xBCR14MNVCHvzUNdLm53Gk/GY5GBPnM1fYiOCldW5Vri/36WT9Zvwqh m4WQMg9nTWhXhcTYzIstBrvXXDMwZ+2l+/L837K34VzfUbh7S5CuALJ+aEb6d8My5D1m fRHM+SMw72D98fCJ7YmJTPmZeV23pbc0WjxvE59CnSmLPhAdALPPruKaXc0cMsM8XPlD GHzw==
Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1494589316; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qh6It01Yax2WSS57Jm/eQ8xmPzrZyqiwEcz2GBAo+3vsUaDc8dpIt8+7SMRGbCnwvu SufXKwp9HPoREBZNFh+DjU6JTILgrqwqug/Dg5MosrYsTr9ghW7xUG2sDk3W419aGiKo RdtbuowCQwrB7Tmyj1088GCQazyr2Sk3+3P0WEatWRTAG4o9oAZBfWUgICeAw9523818 1ZVpYg29tNLZFiGpvL3ql+6q7D8zCvCCRgdPycLEQCPOR9wSuglRota1oyvWlEQ73FI6 8dKjTviYX1O7jpkXfwL3HTkYOsgKQtcBOpCcSgRYfq1g5isdSptreYRgPmyzMtLfhO7d de0A==
Cc: ceph-users <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <5523c12b-dfed-476e-04c8-e23252730860@onsager.ugr.es>
References: <15bd2252c90.ef3f2cc431055.6852089404882611876@zohocorp.com> <CALe9h7fDy7nVO-=oirE4MgYQEwCc-fLjEXDkK3cWsX_Q7O5cJg@mail.gmail.com> <15bf1331151.d7e78aa33929.4088619654131069849@zohocorp.com> <5523c12b-dfed-476e-04c8-e23252730860@onsager.ugr.es>

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:09 AM, gjprabu <gjprabu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Webert,

Thanks for your reply , can pls suggest ceph pg value for data and metadata. I have set 128 for data and 128 for metadata , is this correct

Well I think this has nothing to do with your current problem but the PG number depends on your use case.

Try using this tool to estimate the best for your needs: http://ceph.com/pgcalc/

Regards,

Webert Lima

DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia

Belo Horizonte - Brasil

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

References:
- Ceph health warn MDS failing to respond to cache pressure
  - From: gjprabu
- Re: Ceph health warn MDS failing to respond to cache pressure
  - From: John Spray
- Re: Ceph health warn MDS failing to respond to cache pressure
  - From: gjprabu
- Re: Ceph health warn MDS failing to respond to cache pressure
  - From: José M. Martín

Prev by Date: Re: Ceph health warn MDS failing to respond to cache pressure
Next by Date: Re: Ceph MDS daemonperf
Previous by thread: Re: Ceph health warn MDS failing to respond to cache pressure
Next by thread: Limit bandwidth on RadosGW?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Information on CEPH] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Ceph Development] [Ceph Large] [Ceph Dev] [Linux USB Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [xfs]