Hi Ilya, On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:06 AM, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:01 AM, Alex Gorbachev <ag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Alex Gorbachev <ag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I am trying to understand the cause of a problem we started >>> encountering a few weeks ago. There are 30 or so per hour messages on >>> OSD nodes of type: >>> >>> ceph-osd.33.log:2017-04-10 13:42:39.935422 7fd7076d8700 0 bad crc in >>> data 2227614508 != exp 2469058201 >>> >>> and >>> >>> 2017-04-10 13:42:39.939284 7fd722c42700 0 -- 10.80.3.25:6826/5752 >>> submit_message osd_op_reply(1826606251 >>> rbd_data.922d95238e1f29.00000000000101bf [set-alloc-hint object_size >>> 16777216 write_size 16777216,write 6328320~12288] v103574'18626765 >>> uv18626765 ondisk = 0) v6 remote, 10.80.3.216:0/1934733503, failed >>> lossy con, dropping message 0x3b55600 >>> >>> On a client sometimes, but not corresponding to the above: >>> >>> Apr 10 11:53:15 roc-5r-scd216 kernel: [4906599.023174] libceph: osd96 >>> 10.80.3.25:6822 socket error on write >>> >>> And from time to time, slow requests: >>> >>> 2017-04-10 13:00:04.280686 osd.91 10.80.3.45:6808/5665 231 : cluster >>> [WRN] slow request 30.108325 seconds old, received at 2017-04-10 >>> 12:59:34.172283: osd_op(client.11893449.1:324079247 >>> rbd_data.8fcdfb238e1f29.00000000000187e7 [set-alloc-hint object_size >>> 16777216 write_size 16777216,write 10772480~8192] 14.ed0bcdec >>> ondisk+write e103545) currently waiting for subops from 2,104 >>> 2017-04-10 13:00:06.280949 osd.91 10.80.3.45:6808/5665 232 : cluster >>> [WRN] 2 slow requests, 1 included below; oldest blocked for > >>> 32.108610 secs >>> >>> Questions: >>> >>> 1. Is there any way to drill further into the "bad crc" message? >>> sometimes they have nothing before or after them, but how to determine >>> from/to what this came from - another OSD, client, which one? >>> >>> 2. Network seems OK - no errors on NICs, regression testing does not >>> show any issues. I realize this can be disk response, but using >>> Christian Balzer's atop recommendation shows a pretty normal system. >>> What is my best course of troubleshooting here - dump historic ops on >>> OSD, wireshark the links or anything else? >>> >>> 3. Christian, if you are looking at this, what would be your red flags in atop? >>> >> >> One more note: OSD nodes are running kernel 4.10.2-041002-generic and >> clients - 4.4.23-040423-generic > > Hi Alex, > > Did you upgrade the kernel client from < 4.4 to 4.4 somewhere in that time > frame by any chance? Yes, they were upgraded from 4.2.8 to 4.4.23 in October. Thank you, Alex > > Thanks, > > Ilya _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |