CephFS kernel driver is 10-15x slower than FUSE driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pretty much says it all. 1GB test file copy to local:

$ time cp /mnt/ceph-kernel-driver-test/test.img .

real 2m50.063s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m9.000s

$ time cp /mnt/ceph-fuse-test/test.img .

real 0m3.648s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m1.872s

Yikes. The kernel driver averages ~5MB and the fuse driver averages ~150MBish? Something crazy is happening here. It's not caching, I ran both tests fresh.

Ubuntu 16.04.2, 4.4.0-72-generic, ceph-fuse 10.2.6-1xenial, ceph-fs-common 10.2.6-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 (I also tried the 16.04.2 one, same issue).

Anyone run into this? Did a lot of digging on the ML and didn't see anything. I'm was going to use FUSE for production, but it tends to lag more on a lot of small requests so I had to fall back the kernel driver.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux