Re: Question about unfound objects

Steve Taylor <steve.taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> · Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:13:41 +0000

Good suggestion, Nick. I actually did that at the time. The "ceph osd map" wasn't all that interesting because the OSDs had been outed and their PGs had been mapped to new OSDs. Everything appeared to be in order with the PGs being mapped to the right
 number of new OSDs. The PG mappings looked fine, but the objects just didn't exist anywhere except on the OSDs that had been marked out.

The PG queries were a little more useful, but still didn't really help in the end. In all cases (unfound objects from 2 OSDs in each of 2 occurrences), the PGs showed 5 or so OSDs where they thought the unfound objects might be, one of which was an OSD
 that had been marked out. In both cases we even waited until backfilling completed to see if perhaps the missing objects would turn up somewhere else, but none ever did.

In the first instance we were simply able to reattach the 2 OSDs to the cluster with 0 weight and recover the unfound objects. The second instance involved drive problems and was a little bit trickier. The drives had experienced errors and the XFS filesystems
 had both become corrupt and wouldn't even mount. We didn't have any spare drives large enough, so I ended up using dd, ignoring errors, to copy the disks to RBDs in a different Ceph cluster. I then kernel mapped the RBDs on the host with the failed drives,
 ran XFS repairs on them, mouted them to the OSD directories, started the OSDs, and put them back in the cluster with 0 weight. I was lucky enough that those objects were available and they were recovered. Of course I immediately removed those OSDs once the
 unfound objects cleared up.

That's the other intersting aspect of this problem. This cluster had 4TB HGST drives for its OSDs, but we had to expand it fairly urgently and didn't have enough drives. We added two new servers, each with 16 4TB drives and 16 8TB HGST He8 drives. In both
 instances the problems we encountered were with the 8TB drives. We have since acquired more 4TB drives and have replaced all of the 8TB drives in the cluster. We have a total of 8 production clusters globally and have been running Ceph in production for 2
 years. These two occurences recently are the only times we've seen these types of issues, and it was exclusive to the 8TB OSDs. I'm not sure how that would cause such a problem, but it's an interesting data point.

On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 17:33 +0100, Nick Fisk wrote:

Hi Steve,

If you can recreate or if you can remember the object name, it might be worth trying to run “ceph osd map” on the objects and see where
 it thinks they map to. And/or maybe pg query might show something?

Nick

Steve Taylor |
Senior Software Engineer |
StorageCraft
 Technology Corporation

380 Data Drive Suite 300 |
Draper |
Utah |
84020

Office:
801.871.2799 |

If you are not the intended recipient of this message or received it erroneously, please notify the sender and delete it, together with any attachments, and be advised that any dissemination or copying of this
 message is prohibited.

From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Steve Taylor

Sent: 30 March 2017 16:24

To: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: [ceph-users] Question about unfound objects

We've had a couple of puzzling experiences recently with unfound

objects, and I wonder if anyone can shed some light.

This happened with Hammer 0.94.7 on a cluster with 1,309 OSDs. Our use

case is exclusively RBD in this cluster, so it's naturally replicated.

The rbd pool size is 3, min_size is 2. The crush map is flat, so each

host is a failure domain. The OSD hosts are 4U Supermicro chassis with

32 OSDs each. Drive failures have caused the OSD count to be 1,309

instead of 1,312.

Twice in the last few weeks we've experienced issues where the cluster

was HEALTH_OK but was frequently getting some blocked requests. In each

of the two occurrences we investigated and discovered that the blocked

requests resulted from two drives in the same host that were

misbehaving (different set of 2 drives in each occurrence). We decided

to remove the misbehaving OSDs and let things backfill to see if that

would address the issue. Removing the drives resulted in a small number

of unfound objects, which was surprising. We were able to add the OSDs

back with 0 weight and recover the unfound objects in both cases, but

removing two OSDs from a single failure domain shouldn't have resulted

in unfound objects in an otherwise healthy cluster, correct?

Steve Taylor | Senior Software Engineer |
StorageCraft
 Technology Corporation

380 Data Drive Suite 300 | Draper | Utah | 84020

Office:
801.871.2799 |

If you are not the intended recipient of this message or received it erroneously, please notify the sender and delete it, together with any attachments, and be
 advised that any dissemination or copying of this message is prohibited.

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com