Re: cephfs and erasure coding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



My use case - from past ages /mail is block device for kvm vm. Now I need more space for messages, but I don't want use 3x raw space for replicas.

What is your reccomendations? Create an RBD image on an erasure coded pools when a replicated pool tier set a cache tier?

Thanks.

On 03/30/2017 07:09 AM, Christian Balzer wrote:
If you read that whole thread, you will have noticed my reply and
questions, Sami's question and the total lack of responses by Daniel.
W/o further data I'd be reluctant to call that a success, at least in a
general sense.

A native dovecot-ceph object interface will certainly help performance,
but of course still be somewhat limited by the network nature of things
and also a total black box compared to maildir on a FS.

Lastly, do you feel comfortable to put all your mail eggs into one
(software) storage basket?
At a million+ users I most certainly don't.

--
Best regards,
Konstantin Shalygin

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux