wip-prune-past-intervals is the patch developed in jewel for fast osd map update and might be available in luminos release.
Regards,
Muthu
On Monday, 27 March 2017, Wido den Hollander <wido@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Op 27 maart 2017 om 8:41 schreef Muthusamy Muthiah <muthiah.muthusamy@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
> Hi Wido,
>
> Yes slow map update was happening and CPU hitting 100%.
So it indeed seems you are CPU bound at that moment. That's indeed a problem when you have a lot of map changes to work through on the OSDs.
It's recommended to have 1 CPU core per OSD as during recovery/boot this power is needed badly by the OSDs.
> We also tried to set noup flag to true so that the cluster osdmap remained
> in same version . This made each OSD updated to the current map slowly . At
> one point we lost patience due to critical timelines and re-insalled the
> cluster. However we plan to do this recovery again and find optimum
> procedure for recovery .
The noup flag can indeed 'help' here to prevent new maps from being produced.
> Sage was commenting that there is another solution available in Luminous
> which would recover the OSDs at much faster rate than the current one by
> skipping some maps instead of going in sequential way.
I am not aware of those improvements. Sage (or another dev) would need to comment on that.
Wido
>
> Thanks,
> Muthu
>
> On 20 March 2017 at 22:13, Wido den Hollander <wido@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > > Op 18 maart 2017 om 10:39 schreef Muthusamy Muthiah <
> > muthiah.muthusamy@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We had similar issue on one of the 5 node cluster cluster again during
> > > recovery(200/335 OSDs are to be recovered) , we see a lot of differences
> > > in the OSDmap epocs between OSD which is booting and the current one same
> > > is below,
> > >
> > > - In the current situation the OSD are trying to register with
> > an
> > > old OSDMAP version *7620 * but he current version in the cluster is
> > > higher *13102
> > > *version – as a result it takes longer for OSD to update to this version
> > ..
> > >
> >
> > Do you see these OSDs eating 100% CPU at that moment? Eg, could it be that
> > the CPUs are not fast enough to process all the map updates quick enough.
> >
> > iirc map updates are not processed multi-threaded.
> >
> > Wido
> >
> > >
> > > We also see 2017-03-18 09:19:04.628206 7f2056735700 0 --
> > > 10.139.4.69:6836/777372 >> - conn(0x7f20c1bfa800 :6836
> > > s=STATE_ACCEPTING_WAIT_BANNER_ADDR pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).fault with nothing to
> > > send and in the half accept state just closed messages on many osds which
> > > are recovering.
> > >
> > > Suggestions would be helpful.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Muthu
> > >
> > > On 13 February 2017 at 18:14, Wido den Hollander <wido@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > Op 13 februari 2017 om 12:57 schreef Muthusamy Muthiah <
> > > > muthiah.muthusamy@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > We also have same issue on one of our platforms which was upgraded
> > from
> > > > > 11.0.2 to 11.2.0 . The issue occurs on one node alone where CPU hits
> > 100%
> > > > > and OSDs of that node marked down. Issue not seen on cluster which
> > was
> > > > > installed from scratch with 11.2.0.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > How many maps is this OSD behind?
> > > >
> > > > Does it help if you set the nodown flag for a moment to let it catch
> > up?
> > > >
> > > > Wido
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > *[root@xxxxxxxxxx ~] # systemctl start ceph-osd@315.service
> > > > > <ceph-osd@315.service> [root@xxxxxxxxxx ~] # cd /var/log/ceph/
> > > > > [root@xxxxxxxxxx ceph] # tail -f *osd*315.log 2017-02-13
> > 11:29:46.752897
> > > > > 7f995c79b940 0 <cls>
> > > > > /home/jenkins-build/build/workspace/ceph-build/ARCH/x86_
> > > > 64/AVAILABLE_ARCH/x86_64/AVAILABLE_DIST/centos7/DIST/
> > > > centos7/MACHINE_SIZE/huge/release/11.2.0/rpm/el7/BUILD/
> > > > ceph-11.2.0/src/cls/hello/cls_hello.cc:296:
> > > > > loading cls_hello 2017-02-13 11:29:46.753065 7f995c79b940 0
> > _get_class
> > > > not
> > > > > permitted to load kvs 2017-02-13 11:29:46.757571 7f995c79b940 0
> > > > _get_class
> > > > > not permitted to load lua 2017-02-13 11:29:47.058720 7f995c79b940 0
> > > > > osd.315 44703 crush map has features 288514119978713088, adjusting
> > msgr
> > > > > requires for clients 2017-02-13 11:29:47.058728 7f995c79b940 0
> > osd.315
> > > > > 44703 crush map has features 288514394856620032 was 8705, adjusting
> > msgr
> > > > > requires for mons 2017-02-13 11:29:47.058732 7f995c79b940 0 osd.315
> > > > 44703
> > > > > crush map has features 288531987042664448, adjusting msgr requires
> > for
> > > > osds
> > > > > 2017-02-13 11:29:48.343979 7f995c79b940 0 osd.315 44703 load_pgs
> > > > > 2017-02-13 11:29:55.913550 7f995c79b940 0 osd.315 44703 load_pgs
> > opened
> > > > > 130 pgs 2017-02-13 11:29:55.913604 7f995c79b940 0 osd.315 44703
> > using 1
> > > > op
> > > > > queue with priority op cut off at 64. 2017-02-13 11:29:55.914102
> > > > > 7f995c79b940 -1 osd.315 44703 log_to_monitors {default=true}
> > 2017-02-13
> > > > > 11:30:19.384897 7f9939bbb700 1 heartbeat_map reset_timeout 'tp_osd
> > > > thread
> > > > > tp_osd' had timed out after 15 2017-02-13 11:30:31.073336
> > 7f9955a2b700 1
> > > > > heartbeat_map is_healthy 'tp_osd thread tp_osd' had timed out after
> > 15
> > > > > 2017-02-13 11:30:31.073343 7f9955a2b700 1 heartbeat_map is_healthy
> > > > 'tp_osd
> > > > > thread tp_osd' had timed out after 15 2017-02-13 11:30:31.073344
> > > > > 7f9955a2b700 1 heartbeat_map is_healthy 'tp_osd thread tp_osd' had
> > timed
> > > > > out after 15 2017-02-13 11:30:31.073345 7f9955a2b700 1 heartbeat_map
> > > > > is_healthy 'tp_osd thread tp_osd' had timed out after 15 2017-02-13
> > > > > 11:30:31.073347 7f9955a2b700 1 heartbeat_map is_healthy 'tp_osd
> > thread
> > > > > tp_osd' had timed out after 15 2017-02-13 11:30:31.073348
> > 7f9955a2b700 1
> > > > > heartbeat_map is_healthy 'tp_osd thread tp_osd' had timed out after
> > > > > 152017-02-13 11:30:54.772516 7f995c79b940 0 osd.315 44703 done with
> > > > init,
> > > > > starting boot process*
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > *Thanks,*
> > > > > *Muthu*
> > > > >
> > > > > On 13 February 2017 at 10:50, Andreas Gerstmayr <
> > > > andreas.gerstmayr@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Due to a faulty upgrade from Jewel 10.2.0 to Kraken 11.2.0 our test
> > > > > > cluster is unhealthy since about two weeks and can't recover itself
> > > > > > anymore (unfortunately I skipped the upgrade to 10.2.5 because I
> > > > > > missed the ".z" in "All clusters must first be upgraded to Jewel
> > > > > > 10.2.z").
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Immediately after the upgrade I saw the following in the OSD logs:
> > > > > > s=STATE_ACCEPTING_WAIT_BANNER_ADDR pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).fault with
> > nothing
> > > > > > to send and in the half accept state just closed
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There are also missed heartbeats in the OSD logs, and the OSDs
> > which
> > > > > > don't send heartbeats have the following in their logs:
> > > > > > 2017-02-08 19:44:51.367828 7f9be8c37700 1 heartbeat_map is_healthy
> > > > > > 'tp_osd thread tp_osd' had timed out after 15
> > > > > > 2017-02-08 19:44:54.271010 7f9bc4e96700 1 heartbeat_map
> > reset_timeout
> > > > > > 'tp_osd thread tp_osd' had timed out after 15
> > > > > >
> > > > > > During investigating we found out that some OSDs were lagging about
> > > > > > 100-20000 OSD map epochs behind. The monitor publishes new epochs
> > > > > > every few seconds, but the OSD daemons are pretty slow in applying
> > > > > > them (up to a few minutes for 100 epochs). During recovery of the
> > 24
> > > > > > OSDs of a storage node the CPU is running at almost 100% (the nodes
> > > > > > have 16 real cores, or 32 with Hyper-Threading).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We had at times servers where all 24 OSDs were up-to-date with the
> > > > > > latest OSD map, but somehow they lost it and were lagging behind
> > > > > > again. During recovery some OSDs used up to 25 GB of RAM, which
> > led to
> > > > > > out of memory and further lagging of the OSDs of the affected
> > server.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We already set the nodown, noout, norebalance, nobackfill,
> > norecover,
> > > > > > noscrub and nodeep-scrub flags to prevent OSD flapping and even
> > more
> > > > > > new OSD epochs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there anything we can do to let the OSDs recover? It seems that
> > the
> > > > > > servers don't have enough CPU resources for recovery. I already
> > played
> > > > > > around with the osd map message max setting (when I increased it to
> > > > > > 1000 to speed up recovery, the OSDs didn't get any updates at
> > all?),
> > > > > > and the osd heartbeat grace and osd thread timeout settings (to
> > give
> > > > > > the overloaded server more time), but without success so far. I've
> > > > > > seen errors related to the AsyncMessenger in the logs, so I
> > reverted
> > > > > > back to the SimpleMessenger (which was working successfully with
> > > > > > Jewel).
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cluster details:
> > > > > > 6 storage nodes with 2x Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 8x2.40GHz
> > > > > > 256GB RAM
> > > > > > Each storage node has 24 HDDs attached, one OSD per disk, journal
> > on
> > > > same
> > > > > > disk
> > > > > > 3 monitors in total, co-located with the storage nodes
> > > > > > separate front and back network (10 Gbit)
> > > > > > OS: CentOS 7.2.1511
> > > > > > Kernel: 4.9.8-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 from elrepo.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Andreas
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > ceph-users mailing list
> > > > > > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph. com
> > > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > ceph-users mailing list
> > > > > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph. com
> > > >
> >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
