Re: libjemalloc.so.1 not used?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



you need to recompile ceph with jemalloc, without have tcmalloc dev librairies.

LD_PRELOAD has never work for jemalloc and ceph


----- Mail original -----
De: "Engelmann Florian" <florian.engelmann@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
À: "ceph-users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Envoyé: Lundi 27 Mars 2017 16:54:33
Objet:  libjemalloc.so.1 not used?

Hi, 

we are testing Ceph as block storage (XFS based OSDs) running in a hyper converged setup with KVM as hypervisor. We are using NVMe SSD only (Intel DC P5320) and I would like to use jemalloc on Ubuntu xenial (current kernel 4.4.0-64-generic). I tried to use /etc/default/ceph and uncommented: 


# /etc/default/ceph 
# 
# Environment file for ceph daemon systemd unit files. 
# 

# Increase tcmalloc cache size 
TCMALLOC_MAX_TOTAL_THREAD_CACHE_BYTES=134217728 

## use jemalloc instead of tcmalloc 
# 
# jemalloc is generally faster for small IO workloads and when 
# ceph-osd is backed by SSDs. However, memory usage is usually 
# higher by 200-300mb. 
# 
LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjemalloc.so.1 

and it looks like the OSDs are using jemalloc: 

lsof |grep -e "ceph-osd.*8074.*malloc" 
ceph-osd 8074 ceph mem REG 252,0 294776 659213 /usr/lib/libtcmalloc.so.4.2.6 
ceph-osd 8074 ceph mem REG 252,0 219816 658861 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjemalloc.so.1 
ceph-osd 8074 8116 ceph mem REG 252,0 294776 659213 /usr/lib/libtcmalloc.so.4.2.6 
ceph-osd 8074 8116 ceph mem REG 252,0 219816 658861 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjemalloc.so.1 
ceph-osd 8074 8117 ceph mem REG 252,0 294776 659213 /usr/lib/libtcmalloc.so.4.2.6 
ceph-osd 8074 8117 ceph mem REG 252,0 219816 658861 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjemalloc.so.1 
ceph-osd 8074 8118 ceph mem REG 252,0 294776 659213 /usr/lib/libtcmalloc.so.4.2.6 
ceph-osd 8074 8118 ceph mem REG 252,0 219816 658861 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjemalloc.so.1 
[...] 

But perf top shows something different: 

Samples: 11M of event 'cycles:pp', Event count (approx.): 603904862529620 
Overhead Shared Object Symbol 
1.86% libtcmalloc.so.4.2.6 [.] operator new[] 
1.73% [kernel] [k] mem_cgroup_iter 
1.34% libstdc++.so.6.0.21 [.] std::__ostream_insert<char, std::char_traits<char> > 
1.29% libpthread-2.23.so [.] pthread_mutex_lock 
1.10% [kernel] [k] __switch_to 
0.97% libpthread-2.23.so [.] pthread_mutex_unlock 
0.94% [kernel] [k] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath 
0.92% [kernel] [k] update_cfs_shares 
0.90% libc-2.23.so [.] __memcpy_avx_unaligned 
0.87% libtcmalloc.so.4.2.6 [.] operator delete[] 
0.80% ceph-osd [.] ceph::buffer::ptr::release 
0.80% [kernel] [k] mem_cgroup_zone_lruvec 


Do my OSDs use jemalloc or don't they? 

All the best, 
Florian 




EveryWare AG 
Florian Engelmann 
Systems Engineer 
Zurlindenstrasse 52a 
CH-8003 Zürich 

T +41 44 466 60 00 
F +41 44 466 60 10 

florian.engelmann@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
www.everyware.ch 

_______________________________________________ 
ceph-users mailing list 
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com 

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux