Ok, thanks for confirming.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nope. This is a theoretical possibility but would take a lot of code change that nobody has embarked upon yet.
-GregOn Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:16 PM Sergio A. de Carvalho Jr. <scarvalhojr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:______________________________Hi all,Is it possible to create a pool where the minimum number of replicas for the write operation to be confirmed is 2 but the minimum number of replicas to allow the object to be read is 1?This would be useful when a pool consists of immutable objects, so we'd have:* size 3 (we always keep 3 replicas of all objects)* min size for write 2 (write is complete once 2 replicas are created)* min size for read 1 (read is allowed even if only 1 copy of the object is available)Thanks,Sergio_________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph. com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
