Would you file this as a doc bug? So we discuss properly with tracking. http://tracker.ceph.com On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Deepak Naidu <dnaidu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> because Jewel will be retired: > Hmm. Isn't Jewel LTS ? > > Every other stable releases is a LTS (Long Term Stable) and will receive updates until two LTS are published. > > -- > Deepak > >> On Mar 15, 2017, at 10:09 AM, Shinobu Kinjo <skinjo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> It may be probably kind of challenge but please consider Kraken (or >> later) because Jewel will be retired: >> >> http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/releases/ >> >>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:48 AM, Shain Miley <smiley@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> No this is a production cluster that I have not had a chance to upgrade yet. >>> >>> We had an is with the OS on a node so I am just trying to reinstall ceph and >>> hope that the osd data is still in tact. >>> >>> Once I get things stable again I was planning on upgrading…but the upgrade >>> is a bit intensive by the looks of it so I need to set aside a decent amount >>> of time. >>> >>> Thanks all! >>> >>> Shain >>> >>> On Mar 15, 2017, at 12:38 PM, Vasu Kulkarni <vakulkar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Just curious, why you still want to deploy new hammer instead of stable >>> jewel? Is this a test environment? the last .10 release was basically for >>> bug fixes for 0.94.9. >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Shinobu Kinjo <skinjo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> FYI: >>>> https://plus.google.com/+Cephstorage/posts/HuCaTi7Egg3 >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Shain Miley <smiley@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> I am trying to deploy ceph to a new server using ceph-deply which I have >>>>> done in the past many times without issue. >>>>> >>>>> Right now I am seeing a timeout trying to connect to git.ceph.com: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [hqosd6][INFO ] Running command: env DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive >>>>> apt-get >>>>> -q install --assume-yes ca-certificates >>>>> [hqosd6][DEBUG ] Reading package lists... >>>>> [hqosd6][DEBUG ] Building dependency tree... >>>>> [hqosd6][DEBUG ] Reading state information... >>>>> [hqosd6][DEBUG ] ca-certificates is already the newest version. >>>>> [hqosd6][DEBUG ] 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not >>>>> upgraded. >>>>> [hqosd6][INFO ] Running command: wget -O release.asc >>>>> https://ceph.com/git/?p=ceph.git;a=blob_plain;f=keys/release.asc >>>>> [hqosd6][WARNIN] --2017-03-15 11:49:16-- >>>>> https://ceph.com/git/?p=ceph.git;a=blob_plain;f=keys/release.asc >>>>> [hqosd6][WARNIN] Resolving ceph.com (ceph.com)... 158.69.68.141 >>>>> [hqosd6][WARNIN] Connecting to ceph.com (ceph.com)|158.69.68.141|:443... >>>>> connected. >>>>> [hqosd6][WARNIN] HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved >>>>> Permanently >>>>> [hqosd6][WARNIN] Location: >>>>> https://git.ceph.com/?p=ceph.git;a=blob_plain;f=keys/release.asc >>>>> [following] >>>>> [hqosd6][WARNIN] --2017-03-15 11:49:17-- >>>>> https://git.ceph.com/?p=ceph.git;a=blob_plain;f=keys/release.asc >>>>> [hqosd6][WARNIN] Resolving git.ceph.com (git.ceph.com)... 8.43.84.132 >>>>> [hqosd6][WARNIN] Connecting to git.ceph.com >>>>> (git.ceph.com)|8.43.84.132|:443... failed: Connection timed out. >>>>> [hqosd6][WARNIN] Retrying. >>>>> [hqosd6][WARNIN] >>>>> [hqosd6][WARNIN] --2017-03-15 11:51:25-- (try: 2) >>>>> https://git.ceph.com/?p=ceph.git;a=blob_plain;f=keys/release.asc >>>>> [hqosd6][WARNIN] Connecting to git.ceph.com >>>>> (git.ceph.com)|8.43.84.132|:443... failed: Connection timed out. >>>>> [hqosd6][WARNIN] Retrying. >>>>> [hqosd6][WARNIN] >>>>> [hqosd6][WARNIN] --2017-03-15 11:53:34-- (try: 3) >>>>> https://git.ceph.com/?p=ceph.git;a=blob_plain;f=keys/release.asc >>>>> [hqosd6][WARNIN] Connecting to git.ceph.com >>>>> (git.ceph.com)|8.43.84.132|:443... failed: Connection timed out. >>>>> [hqosd6][WARNIN] Retrying. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am wondering if this is a known issue. >>>>> >>>>> Just an fyi...I am using an older version of ceph-deply (1.5.36) because >>>>> in >>>>> the past upgrading to a newer version I was not able to install hammer >>>>> on >>>>> the cluster…so the workaround was to use a slightly older version. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance for any help you may be able to provide. >>>>> >>>>> Shain >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> ceph-users mailing list >>>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ceph-users mailing list >>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain > confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution > is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by > reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |