On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 6:37 AM, Tim Serong <tserong at suse.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Pretend I'm about to upgrade from one Ceph release to another. I want > to know that the cluster is healthy enough to sanely upgrade (MONs > quorate, no OSDs actually on fire), but don't care about HEALTH_WARN > issues like "too many PGs per OSD" or "crush map has legacy tunables". > > In this case, if I run `ceph health` and is says HEALTH_OK, I'm good, > and if it says HEALTH_ERR, I know things are bad. But if it says > HEALTH_WARN, I might be OK, or I might not. > > Is there any way to get a status like HEALTH_GOOD_ENOUGH? ;-) Think: > some `ceph health` invocation a machine can parse to know whether or not > to allow upgrading the cluster. This is one of the Groundhog Day topics of Ceph :-) This is the ticket I like to link to as a possible first step for anyone working on improving the health reporting: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7192 Cheers, John > > Thanks, > > Tim > -- > Tim Serong > Senior Clustering Engineer > SUSE > tserong at suse.com > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users at lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |