Hello, On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:30:28 +0300 Irek Fasikhov wrote: > Hi, Maxime. > > Linux SMR is only starting with version 4.9 kernel. > What Irek said. Also, SMR in general is probably a bad match for Ceph. Drives like that really want to be treated more like a tape than anything else. In general, do you really need all this space, what's your use case? Unless it's something like a backup/archive cluster or pool with little to none concurrent R/W access, you're likely to run out of IOPS (again) long before filling these monsters up. Christian > > С уважением, Фасихов Ирек Нургаязович > Моб.: +79229045757 > > 2017-02-03 10:26 GMT+03:00 Maxime Guyot <Maxime.Guyot@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > I’m wondering if anyone in the ML is running a cluster with archive type > > HDDs, like the HGST Ultrastar Archive (10TB@7.2k RPM) or the Seagate > > Enterprise Archive (8TB@5.9k RPM)? > > > > As far as I read they both fall in the enterprise class HDDs so **might** > > be suitable for a low performance, low cost cluster? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Maxime > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > > -- Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer chibi@xxxxxxx Global OnLine Japan/Rakuten Communications http://www.gol.com/ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |