Re: Review of Ceph on ZFS - or how not to deploy Ceph for RBD + OpenStack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/01/2017 7:21 AM, Kevin Olbrich wrote:

Read-Cache using normal Samsung PRO SSDs works very well

How did you implement the cache and measure the results?

a ZFS ssd cache will perform very badly with VM hosting and/or distriibuted filesystems, the random nature of the I/O and the ARC cache essential render it useless. I never saw better than a 6% hit rate with L2ARC.


Also if used as Journals or SSD Tiers, Samsung Pro have shocking write performance.

ZFS is probably not optimal for Ceph, but regardless of the underlying file system, with a 5 Node, 2G, Replica 3 setup you are going to see pretty bad write performance.

POOMA U - but I believe that linked clones, especially old ones are going to be pretty slow.

--
Lindsay Mathieson

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux