Re: Unbalanced OSD's

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday, December 30, 2016 07:05 PM Brian Andrus wrote:

> We have a set it and forget it cronjob setup once an hour to keep things a bit more balanced.
>
> 1 * * * * /bin/bash /home/briana/reweight_osd.sh 2>&1 | /usr/bin/logger -t ceph_reweight
>
> The script checks and makes sure cluster health is OK and no other rebalancing is going on. It will 
> also check the reported STDDEV from `ceph osd df` and if outside acceptable ranges executes a 
> gentle reweight.

Would you mind sharing that script?

> The three parameters after the reweight-by-utilization are not well documented, but they are
>
> 103 - Select OSDs that are 3% above the average (default is 120 but we want a larger pool of OSDs to 
choose from to get an eventual tighter tolerance)
> .010 - don't reweight any OSD more than this increment (keeps the impact low)
> 10 - number of OSDs to select (to keep impact manageable)

Ah! Thank you for that pointer.

For the record the same arguments can be used for dry-runs of "ceph osd test-reweight-by-utilization ..." 
and correspond to these values in the output from test-reweight-by-utilization:

  oload 120
  max_change 0.05
  max_change_osds 4

The above values are the current defaults in Hammer (0.94.9), but can easily be changed to see the impact 
before running the actual rebalance..

Regards,
Jens Dueholm Christensen
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux