Actually, Greg and Sage are working up other branches, nvm. -Sam On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I just pushed a branch wip-14120-10.2.4 with a possible fix. > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/12349/ is a fix for a known bug > which didn't quite make it into 10.2.4, it's possible that > 165e5abdbf6311974d4001e43982b83d06f9e0cc which did made the bug much > more likely to happen. wip-14120-10.2.4 has that fix cherry-picked on > top of 10.2.4. Can you try it and let us know the result? > -Sam > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Ruben Kerkhof <ruben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Ruben Kerkhof <ruben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> And another interesting information (maybe). I have ceph-osd process with big cpu load (as Steve said no iowait and no excessive memory usage). If I restart the ceph-osd daemon cpu load becomes OK during exactly 15 minutes for me. After 15 minutes, I have the cpu load again. It's curious this number of 15 minutes, isn't it? >>> >>> Thanks, l'll check how long it takes for this to happen on my cluster. >> >> Indeed, 15 minutes, on the dot. >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |