Hi Yoann, Thank you for your input. I was just told by RH support that it’s gonna make it to RHCS 2.0 (10.2.3). Thank you guys for the fix ! We thought about increasing the number of PGs just after changing the merge/split threshold values but this would have led to a _lot_ of data movements (1.2 billion of XFS files) over weeks, without any possibility to scrub / deep-scrub to ensure data consistency. Still as soon as we get the fix, we will increase the number of PGs. Regards, Frederic. > Le 1 déc. 2016 à 16:47, Yoann Moulin <yoann.moulin@xxxxxxx> a écrit : > > Hello, > >> We're impacted by this bug (case 01725311). Our cluster is running RHCS 2.0 and is no more capable to scrub neither deep-scrub. >> >> [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17859 >> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394007 >> [3] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11898 >> >> I'm worried we'll have to live with a cluster that can't scrub/deep-scrub until March 2017 (ETA for RHCS 2.2 running Jewel 10.2.4). >> >> Can we have this fix any sooner ? > > As far as I know about that bug, it appears if you have big PGs, a workaround could be increasing the pg_num of the pool that has the biggest PGs. > > -- > Yoann Moulin > EPFL IC-IT _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |