Re: CephFS - Couple of questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi James,

> o) Based on our performance testing we’re seeing the kernel client by far
> out-performs the fuse client – older mailing list posts from 2014 suggest
> this is expected, is the recommendation still to use the kernel client?

I guess so, but about this I'm not 100% sure.

> o) Ref: http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/cephfs/experimental-features/ lists
> multiple MDS as experimental – I’m assuming this refers to multiple active
> MDS and having one active / X standby is a valid/stable configuration?  (We
> haven’t noticed any issues during testing – just wanting to be sure).

Yes, one active / X standby is considered a valid and stable
configuration for MDS.

Best,
Martin
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux