sure, as requested:
cephfs was created using the following command:
ceph.conf:
https://paste.debian.net/895841/
# ceph osd crush tree
https://paste.debian.net/895839/
cephfs was created using the following command:
ceph osd pool create cephfs_metadata 128 128
ceph osd pool create cephfs_data 128 128
ceph fs new cephfs cephfs_metadata cephfs_data
ceph.conf:
https://paste.debian.net/895841/
# ceph osd crush tree
https://paste.debian.net/895839/
# ceph osd crush rule list
[
"replicated_ruleset",
"replicated_ruleset_ssd"
]
# ceph osd crush rule dump
https://paste.debian.net/895842/
# ceph osd tree
ID WEIGHT TYPE NAME UP/DOWN REWEIGHT PRIMARY-AFFINITY
-3 0.07999 root default-ssd
-5 0.03999 host dc1-master-ds02-ssd
11 0.03999 osd.11 up 1.00000 1.00000
-6 0.03999 host dc1-master-ds03-ssd
13 0.03999 osd.13 up 1.00000 1.00000
-1 31.39999 root default
-2 31.39999 host dc1-master-ds01
0 3.70000 osd.0 up 1.00000 1.00000
1 3.70000 osd.1 up 1.00000 1.00000
2 4.00000 osd.2 up 1.00000 1.00000
3 4.00000 osd.3 up 1.00000 1.00000
4 4.00000 osd.4 up 1.00000 1.00000
5 4.00000 osd.5 up 1.00000 1.00000
6 4.00000 osd.6 up 1.00000 1.00000
7 4.00000 osd.7 up 1.00000 1.00000
# ceph osd pool ls
.rgw.root
master.rgw.control
master.rgw.data.root
master.rgw.gc
master.rgw.log
master.rgw.intent-log
master.rgw.usage
master.rgw.users.keys
master.rgw.users.email
master.rgw.users.swift
master.rgw.users.uid
master.rgw.buckets.index
master.rgw.buckets.data
master.rgw.meta
master.rgw.buckets.non-ec
rbd
cephfs_metadata
cephfs_data
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:33 AM Burkhard Linke <Burkhard.Linke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
On 11/15/2016 01:27 PM, Webert de Souza Lima wrote:
> Not that I know of. On 5 other clusters it works just fine and
> configuration is the same for all.
> On this cluster I was using only radosgw, but cephfs was not in use
> but it had been already created following our procedures.
>
> This happened right after mounting it.
Do you use any different setup for one of the pools?
active+undersized+degraded means that the crush rules for a PG cannot be
satisfied, and 128 PGs sounds like the default setup for the number of PGs.
With 10 OSDs I would suspect that you do not have enough host to satisfy
all crush requirements. Can you post your crush tree, the crush rules
and the detailed pool configuration?
Regards,
Burkhard
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
