Thanks, though CERN 30PB cluster test, the osdmap caches causes memory increase, I'll test how these configs( osd_map_cache_size, osd_map_max_advance, etc.) influence the memory usage. 2016-11-08 22:48 GMT+08:00 zphj1987 <zphj1987@xxxxxxxxx>: > I remember CERN had a test ceph cluster 30PB and the osd use more memery > than usual ,and thay tune osdmap_epochs ,if it is the osdmap make it use > more memery,ithink you may have a test use less osdmap_epochs to see if > have some change > > default mon_min_osdmap_epochs is 500 > > > zphj1987 > > 2016-11-08 22:08 GMT+08:00 Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> >> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> > From: Dong Wu <archer.wudong@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Date: 2016-10-27 18:50 GMT+08:00 >> > Subject: Re: Hammer OSD memory increase when add new >> > machine >> > To: huang jun <hjwsm1989@xxxxxxxxx> >> > 抄送： ceph-users <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > >> > 2016-10-27 17:50 GMT+08:00 huang jun <hjwsm1989@xxxxxxxxx>: >> > > how do you add the new machine ? >> > > does it first added to default ruleset and then you add the new rule >> > > for this group? >> > > do you have data pool use the default rule, does these pool contain >> > > data? >> > >> > we dont use default ruleset, when we add new group machine, >> > crush_location auto generate root and chassis, then we add a new rule >> > for this group. >> > >> > >> > > 2016-10-27 17:34 GMT+08:00 Dong Wu <archer.wudong@xxxxxxxxx>: >> > >> Hi all, >> > >> >> > >> We have a ceph cluster only use rbd. The cluster contains several >> > >> group machines, each group contains several machines, then each >> > >> machine has 12 SSDs, each ssd as an OSD (journal and data together). >> > >> eg: >> > >> group1: machine1~machine12 >> > >> group2: machine13~machine24 >> > >> ...... >> > >> each group is separated with other group, which means each group has >> > >> separated pools. >> > >> >> > >> we use Hammer(0.94.6) compiled with jemalloc(4.2). >> > >> >> > >> We have found that when we add a new group machine, the other group >> > >> machine's memory increase 5% more or less (OSDs usage). >> > >> >> > >> each group's data is separated with others, so backfill only in >> > >> group, >> > >> not across. >> > >> Why add a group of machine cause others memory increase? Is this >> > >> reasonable? >> >> It could be cached OSDmaps (they get slightly larger when you add OSDs) >> but it's hard to say. It seems more likely that the pools and crush rules >> aren't configured right and you're adding OSDs to the wrong group. >> >> If you look at the 'ceph daemon osd.NNN perf dump' output you can see, >> among other things, how many PGs are on the OSD. Can you capture the >> output before and after the change (and 5% memory footprint increase)? >> >> sage > > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |