hi,
> 在 2016年9月7日，上午10:17，Shain Miley <smiley@xxxxxxx> 写道：
>
> Hello,
>
> It looks like we had 2 osd's fail at some point earlier today, here is the current status of the cluster:
>
> root@rbd1:~# ceph -s
> cluster 504b5794-34bd-44e7-a8c3-0494cf800c23
> health HEALTH_WARN
> 2 pgs backfill
> 5 pgs backfill_toofull
> 69 pgs backfilling
> 74 pgs degraded
> 1 pgs down
> 1 pgs peering
> 74 pgs stuck degraded
> 1 pgs stuck inactive
> 75 pgs stuck unclean
> 74 pgs stuck undersized
> 74 pgs undersized
> recovery 1903019/105270534 objects degraded (1.808%)
> recovery 1120305/105270534 objects misplaced (1.064%)
> crush map has legacy tunables
> monmap e1: 3 mons at {hqceph1=10.35.1.201:6789/0,hqceph2=10.35.1.203:6789/0,hqceph3=10.35.1.205:6789/0}
> election epoch 282, quorum 0,1,2 hqceph1,hqceph2,hqceph3
> osdmap e25019: 108 osds: 105 up, 105 in; 74 remapped pgs
> pgmap v30721368: 3976 pgs, 17 pools, 144 TB data, 51401 kobjects
> 285 TB used, 97367 GB / 380 TB avail
> 1903019/105270534 objects degraded (1.808%)
> 1120305/105270534 objects misplaced (1.064%)
> 3893 active+clean
> 69 active+undersized+degraded+remapped+backfilling
> 6 active+clean+scrubbing
> 3 active+undersized+degraded+remapped+backfill_toofull
> 2 active+clean+scrubbing+deep
> 2 active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill+backfill_toofull
> 1 down+peering
> recovery io 248 MB/s, 84 objects/s
>
> We had been running for a while with 107 osd's (not 108), it looks like osd's 64 and 76 are both now down and out at this point.
>
>
> I have looked though the ceph logs for each osd and did not see anything obvious, the raid controller also does not show the disk offline.
>
> I am wondering if I should try to restart the two osd's that are showing as down...or should I wait until the current recovery is complete?
If the disk is healthy, don't need to wait for it’s completion, that would be dangerous...
>
> The pool has a replica level of '2'...and with 2 failed disks I want to do whatever I can to make sure there is not an issue with missing objects.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Shain
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
