Thanks for the answer!
Samba is very slow.
I have very strict requirements for speed.
I need to write 160 GB of user Windows on Ceph per minute. And the same thing back ...
So I'm trying to find something :) with zero overhead.
Пятница, 12 августа 2016, 10:33 +03:00 от Nick Fisk <nick@xxxxxxxxxx>:
I’m not sure how stable that ceph dokan is, I would imagine the best way to present ceph-fs to windows users would be through samba.
From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ????????? ????????
Sent: 12 August 2016 07:53
To: ceph-users <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ceph-users] High-performance way for access Windows of users to Ceph.
Hello,
I continue to design high-performance cluster Ceph, petascale.
Scheduled to purchase a high-performance server, OS Windows 2016, for clients. Clients are in the Dockers.
https://docs.docker.com/engine/installation/windows/
Virtualization. It does not matter...Clients run program written by them, which generates files of various sizes - from 1 KB to 200 GB (yes, creepy single file size). Network planning to use Infiniband 40 GB/s between clients and Ceph. Clients work with Ceph always on one, and always only either for record or for reading.
While I do not understand what Ceph technology is appropriate to use? Object, block, or file storage CephFS.
So far, it seems to me, i need to use MDS, CephFS and ceph-dokan
https://github.com/ketor/ceph-dokan
Please share the experience of how it is possible to provide access with minimal overhead (preferably zero :( ) Windows Ceph users to the server?
Ie how to make sure that the files generated by the program on Windows very quickly proved to Ceph.
--
Александр Пивушков![]()
--
Александр Пивушков
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
