Re: ceph-fuse segfaults ( jewel 10.2.2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Goncalo,

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Goncalo Borges
<goncalo.borges@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just to confirm that, after applying the patch and recompiling, we are no
> longer seeing segfaults.
>
> I just tested with a user application which would kill ceph-fuse almost
> instantaneously.  Now it is running for quite some time, reading and
> updating the files that it should.
>
> I should test with other applications which were also triggering the
> ceph-fuse segfault, but for now, it is looking good.

Great, thanks for letting us know it worked.

> Is there a particular reason why in 9.2.0 we were not getting such
> segfaults? I am asking because the patch was simply to introduce two lock
> functions in two specific lines of src/client/Client.cc  which, I imagine,
> were also not there in 9.2.0 (unless there was a big rewrite of
> src/client/Client.cc from 9.2.0 to 10.2.2)

The locks were missing in 9.2.0. There were probably instances of the
segfault unreported/unresolved.

-- 
Patrick Donnelly
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux