> -----Original Message----- > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Alex Gorbachev > Sent: 04 July 2016 20:50 > To: Campbell Steven <casteven@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: ceph-users <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tim Bishop <tim- > lists@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Is anyone seeing iissues with > task_numa_find_cpu? > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Campbell Steven <casteven@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Hi Alex/Stefan, > > > > I'm in the middle of testing 4.7rc5 on our test cluster to confirm > > once and for all this particular issue has been completely resolved by > > Peter's recent patch to sched/fair.c refereed to by Stefan above. For > > us anyway the patches that Stefan applied did not solve the issue and > > neither did any 4.5.x or 4.6.x released kernel thus far, hopefully it > > does the trick for you. We could get about 4 hours uptime before > > things went haywire for us. > > > > It's interesting how it seems the CEPH workload triggers this bug so > > well as it's quite a long standing issue that's only just been > > resolved, another user chimed in on the lkml thread a couple of days > > ago as well and again his trace had ceph-osd in it as well. > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/headers/2016/6/21/491 > > > > Campbell > > Campbell, any luck with testing 4.7rc5? rc6 came out just now, and I am > having trouble booting it on an ubuntu box due to some other unrelated > problem. So dropping to kernel 4.2.0 for now, which does not seem to have > this load related problem. > > I looked at the fair.c code in kernel source tree 4.4.14 and it is quite different > than Peter's patch (assuming 4.5.x source), so the patch does not apply > cleanly. Maybe another 4.4.x kernel will get the update. I put in a new 16.04 node yesterday and went straight to 4.7.rc6. It's been backfilling for just under 24 hours now with no drama. Disks are set to use CFQ. > > Thanks, > Alex > > > > > > > On 29 June 2016 at 18:29, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG > > <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Am 29.06.2016 um 04:30 schrieb Alex Gorbachev: > >>> Hi Stefan, > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG > >>> <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> Please be aware that you may need even more patches. Overall this > >>>> needs 3 patches. Where the first two try to fix a bug and the 3rd > >>>> one fixes the fixes + even more bugs related to the scheduler. I've > >>>> no idea on which patch level Ubuntu is. > >>> > >>> Stefan, would you be able to please point to the other two patches > >>> beside https://lkml.org/lkml/diff/2016/6/22/102/1 ? > >> > >> Sorry sure yes: > >> > >> 1. 2b8c41daba32 ("sched/fair: Initiate a new task's util avg to a > >> bounded value") > >> > >> 2.) 40ed9cba24bb7e01cc380a02d3f04065b8afae1d ("sched/fair: Fix > >> post_init_entity_util_avg() serialization") > >> > >> 3.) the one listed at lkml. > >> > >> Stefan > >> > >>> > >>> Thank you, > >>> Alex > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Stefan > >>>> > >>>> Excuse my typo sent from my mobile phone. > >>>> > >>>> Am 28.06.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Tim Bishop <tim-lists@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > >>>> > >>>> Yes - I noticed this today on Ubuntu 16.04 with the default kernel. > >>>> No useful information to add other than it's not just you. > >>>> > >>>> Tim. > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:05:40AM -0400, Alex Gorbachev wrote: > >>>> > >>>> After upgrading to kernel 4.4.13 on Ubuntu, we are seeing a few of > >>>> > >>>> these issues where an OSD would fail with the stack below. I > >>>> logged a > >>>> > >>>> bug at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121101 and there > >>>> is > >>>> > >>>> a similar description at https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/22/102, but > >>>> the > >>>> > >>>> odd part is we have turned off CFQ and blk-mq/scsi-mq and are using > >>>> > >>>> just the noop scheduler. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Does the ceph kernel code somehow use the fair scheduler code > block? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> > >>>> Alex Gorbachev > >>>> > >>>> Storcium > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.684974] CPU: 30 PID: > >>>> > >>>> 10403 Comm: ceph-osd Not tainted 4.4.13-040413-generic > >>>> #201606072354 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.684991] Hardware name: > >>>> > >>>> Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+/X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+, BIOS > 3.2 > >>>> > >>>> 03/04/2015 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685009] task: > >>>> > >>>> ffff880f79df8000 ti: ffff880f79fb8000 task.ti: ffff880f79fb8000 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685024] RIP: > >>>> > >>>> 0010:[<ffffffff810b416e>] [<ffffffff810b416e>] > >>>> > >>>> task_numa_find_cpu+0x22e/0x6f0 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685051] RSP: > >>>> > >>>> 0018:ffff880f79fbb818 EFLAGS: 00010206 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685063] RAX: > >>>> > >>>> 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880f79fbb8b8 RCX: 0000000000000000 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685076] RDX: > >>>> > >>>> 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8810352d4800 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685107] RBP: > >>>> > >>>> ffff880f79fbb880 R08: 00000001020cf87c R09: 0000000000ff00ff > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685150] R10: > >>>> > >>>> 0000000000000009 R11: 0000000000000006 R12: ffff8807c3adc4c0 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685194] R13: > >>>> > >>>> 0000000000000006 R14: 000000000000033e R15: fffffffffffffec7 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685238] FS: > >>>> > >>>> 00007f30e46b8700(0000) GS:ffff88105f580000(0000) > >>>> > >>>> knlGS:0000000000000000 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685283] CS: 0010 DS: > >>>> > >>>> 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685310] CR2: > >>>> > >>>> 000000001321a000 CR3: 0000000853598000 CR4: 00000000000406e0 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685354] Stack: > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685374] > >>>> > >>>> ffffffff813d050f 000000000000000d 0000000000000045 ffff880f79df8000 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685426] > >>>> > >>>> 000000000000033f 0000000000000000 0000000000016b00 > 000000000000033f > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685477] > >>>> > >>>> ffff880f79df8000 ffff880f79fbb8b8 00000000000001f4 0000000000000054 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685528] Call Trace: > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685555] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff813d050f>] ? cpumask_next_and+0x2f/0x40 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685584] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff810b4a6e>] task_numa_migrate+0x43e/0x9b0 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685613] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff810b3acc>] ? update_cfs_shares+0xbc/0x100 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685642] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff810b5059>] numa_migrate_preferred+0x79/0x80 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685672] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff810b9b94>] task_numa_fault+0x7f4/0xd40 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685700] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff813d9634>] ? timerqueue_del+0x24/0x70 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685729] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff810b9205>] ? should_numa_migrate_memory+0x55/0x130 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685762] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff811bd590>] handle_mm_fault+0xbc0/0x1820 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685793] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff810edc00>] ? __hrtimer_init+0x90/0x90 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685822] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff810c211d>] ? remove_wait_queue+0x4d/0x60 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685853] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff8121e20a>] ? poll_freewait+0x4a/0xa0 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685882] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff8106a537>] __do_page_fault+0x197/0x400 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685910] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff8106a7c2>] do_page_fault+0x22/0x30 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685939] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff8180a878>] page_fault+0x28/0x30 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685967] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff813e4c5f>] ? copy_page_to_iter_iovec+0x5f/0x300 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.685997] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff810b2795>] ? select_task_rq_fair+0x625/0x700 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686026] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff813e4f16>] copy_page_to_iter+0x16/0xa0 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686056] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff816f02ad>] skb_copy_datagram_iter+0x14d/0x280 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686087] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff8174a503>] tcp_recvmsg+0x613/0xbe0 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686117] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff8177844e>] inet_recvmsg+0x7e/0xb0 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686146] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff816e0d3b>] sock_recvmsg+0x3b/0x50 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686173] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff816e0f91>] SYSC_recvfrom+0xe1/0x160 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686202] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff810f36f5>] ? ktime_get_ts64+0x45/0xf0 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686230] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff816e239e>] SyS_recvfrom+0xe/0x10 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686259] > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff818086f2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x71 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686287] Code: 55 b0 > >>>> 4c > >>>> > >>>> 89 f7 e8 53 cd ff ff 48 8b 55 b0 49 8b 4e 78 48 8b 82 d8 01 00 00 > >>>> 48 > >>>> > >>>> 83 c1 01 31 d2 49 0f af 86 b0 00 00 00 4c 8b 73 78 <48> f7 f1 48 8b > >>>> 4b > >>>> > >>>> 20 49 89 c0 48 29 c1 48 8b 45 d0 4c 03 43 48 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686512] RIP > >>>> > >>>> [<ffffffff810b416e>] task_numa_find_cpu+0x22e/0x6f0 > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686544] RSP > >>>> <ffff880f79fbb818> > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:46:41 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [137912.686896] ---[ end > >>>> trace > >>>> > >>>> 544cb9f68cb55c93 ]--- > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:52:15 roc04r-sca090 kernel: [138246.669713] mpt2sas_cm0: > >>>> > >>>> log_info(0x30030101): originator(IOP), code(0x03), sub_code(0x0101) > >>>> > >>>> Jun 28 09:55:01 roc0 > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> > >>>> ceph-users mailing list > >>>> > >>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> > >>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Tim. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Tim Bishop > >>>> http://www.bishnet.net/tim/ > >>>> PGP Key: 0x6C226B37FDF38D55 > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> ceph-users mailing list > >>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ceph-users mailing list > >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |