On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Michael Kuriger <mk7193@xxxxxx> wrote:
> I just realized that this issue is probably because I’m running jewel 10.2.1 on the servers side, but accessing from a client running hammer 0.94.7 or infernalis 9.2.1
>
> Here is what happens if I run rbd ls from a client on infernalis. I was testing this access since we weren’t planning on building rpms for Jewel on CentOS 6
>
> $ rbd ls
> 2016-06-13 11:24:06.881591 7fe61e568700 0 -- :/3877046932 >> 10.1.77.165:6789/0 pipe(0x562ed3ea7550 sd=3 :0 s=1 pgs=0 cs=0 l=1 c=0x562ed3ea0ac0).fault
> 2016-06-13 11:24:09.882051 7fe61137f700 0 -- :/3877046932 >> 10.1.78.75:6789/0 pipe(0x7fe608000c00 sd=3 :0 s=1 pgs=0 cs=0 l=1 c=0x7fe608004ef0).fault
> 2016-06-13 11:24:12.882389 7fe61e568700 0 -- :/3877046932 >> 10.1.77.165:6789/0 pipe(0x7fe608008350 sd=4 :0 s=1 pgs=0 cs=0 l=1 c=0x7fe60800c5f0).fault
> 2016-06-13 11:24:18.883642 7fe61e568700 0 -- :/3877046932 >> 10.1.77.165:6789/0 pipe(0x7fe608008350 sd=3 :0 s=1 pgs=0 cs=0 l=1 c=0x7fe6080078e0).fault
> 2016-06-13 11:24:21.884259 7fe61137f700 0 -- :/3877046932 >> 10.1.78.75:6789/0 pipe(0x7fe608000c00 sd=4 :0 s=1 pgs=0 cs=0 l=1 c=0x7fe608007110).fault
Accessing jewel with older clients should work as long as you don't
enable jewel tunables and such; the same goes for older kernels. Can
you do
rbd --debug-ms=20 ls
and attach the output?
Thanks,
Ilya
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
