Ubuntu Trusty: kernel 3.13 vs kernel 4.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Ubuntu Trusty: kernel 3.13 vs kernel 4.2
From: "magicboiz@xxxxxxxxxxx" <magicboiz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:45:30 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1

Hi list,

is there any opinion/recommendation regarding the ubuntu trustyavailable kernels and Ceph(hammer, xfs)?

Does kernel 4.2 worth installing from Ceph(hammer, xfs) perspective?

Thanks :)
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ubuntu Trusty: kernel 3.13 vs kernel 4.2
  - From: Wido den Hollander
- Re: Ubuntu Trusty: kernel 3.13 vs kernel 4.2
  - From: Jan Schermer

Prev by Date: Re: UnboundLocalError: local variable 'region_name' referenced before assignment
Next by Date: 40Mil objects in S3 rados pool / how calculate PGs
Previous by thread: UnboundLocalError: local variable 'region_name' referenced before assignment
Next by thread: Re: Ubuntu Trusty: kernel 3.13 vs kernel 4.2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Information on CEPH] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Ceph Development] [Ceph Large] [Ceph Dev] [Linux USB Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [xfs]

Powered by Linux