Hello, for the record, I did the exact same sequence (no MDS) on my test cluster with exactly the same results. Didn't report it as I assumed it to be a more noisy (but harmless) upgrade artifact. Christian On Tue, 17 May 2016 14:07:21 +0200 Dan van der Ster wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 17 May 2016, Dan van der Ster wrote: > >> Hi Sage et al, > >> > >> I'm updating our pre-prod cluster from 0.94.6 to 0.94.7 and after > >> upgrading the ceph-mon's I'm getting loads of warnings like: > >> > >> 2016-05-17 10:01:29.314785 osd.76 [WRN] failed to encode map e103116 > >> with expected crc > >> > >> I've seen that error is whitelisted in the qa-suite: > >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/pull/602/files > >> > >> Is it really harmless? (This is the first time I've seen such a > >> warning). > > > > Are you sure you were upgrading from v0.94.6? > > Absolutely. I first updated the mons, which I restarted into quorum > with 0.96.7. Then any changes to the osdmap triggered the failed to > encode warning. > The upgrade sequence went like this: > > Update mons 0.94.6 to 0.94.7, restart, quorum. No warnings. > Update mds's 0.94.6 to 0.94.7, restart. Warnings from ~all osds. > Update osds 0.94.6 to 0.94.7, restart host by host. The 0.94.6 osds > printed warnings, the new OSDs did not. > > > I don't see anything that > > would trigger these warnings going from .6 to .7, which is strange. > > Could the osdmap GMT hitset changes have caused it? Commits Mar 24 here: > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/compare/v0.94.6...v0.94.7?expand=1 > > > That said, the errors are generally harmless--it just means the > > monitors are running a different version of the code and the OSDs are > > pulling maps directly from a mon to ensure they are all in sync. It's > > normal during many upgrades, but not expected for this particular > > jump... > > Then I'm curious if others are getting this from 0.94.6 to 0.94.7. > For now I'm waiting to update our prod cluster. > > Thanks! > > Dan > > > > > > sage > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks in advance! > >> > >> Dan > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > This Hammer point release fixes several minor bugs. It also > >> > includes a backport of an improved ‘ceph osd > >> > reweight-by-utilization’ command for handling OSDs with > >> > higher-than-average utilizations. > >> > > >> > We recommend that all hammer v0.94.x users upgrade. > >> > > >> > For more detailed information, see the release announcement at > >> > > >> > http://ceph.com/releases/v0-94-7-hammer-released/ > >> > > >> > or the complete changelog at > >> > > >> > http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/_downloads/v0.94.6.txt > >> > > >> > Getting Ceph > >> > ------------ > >> > > >> > * Git at git://github.com/ceph/ceph.git > >> > * Tarball at http://download.ceph.com/tarballs/ceph-0.94.7.tar.gz > >> > * For packages, see http://ceph.com/docs/master/install/get-packages > >> > * For ceph-deploy, see > >> > http://ceph.com/docs/master/install/install-ceph-deploy > >> > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing > >> > list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> > > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer chibi@xxxxxxx Global OnLine Japan/Rakuten Communications http://www.gol.com/ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |