On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Andrus, Brian Contractor <bdandrus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > So this ‘production ready’ CephFS for jewel seems a little not quite…. > > > > Currently I have a single system mounting CephFS and merely scp-ing data to > it. > > The CephFS mount has 168 TB used, 345 TB / 514 TB avail. > > > > Every so often, I get a HEALTH_WARN message of mds0: Client failing to > respond to cache pressure What client, what version? > Even if I stop the scp, it will not go away until I umount/remount the > filesystem. > > > > For testing, I had the cephfs mounted on about 50 systems and when updated > started on the, I got all kinds of issues with it all. All kinds of issues...? Need more specific bug reports than that to fix things. John > I figured having updated run on a few systems would be a good ‘see what > happens’ if there is a fair amount of access to it. > > > > So, should I not be even considering using CephFS as a large storage mount > for a compute cluster? Is there a sweet spot for what CephFS would be good > for? > > > > > > Brian Andrus > > ITACS/Research Computing > > Naval Postgraduate School > > Monterey, California > > voice: 831-656-6238 > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |