On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Oliver Dzombic <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > there is a memory allocation bug, at least in hammer. > Could you give us any pointer? > Mouting an rbd volume as a block device on a ceph node might run you > into that. Then your mount wont work, and you will have to restart the > OSD daemon(s). > > Its generally not a perfectly good idea. > > Better use a dedicated client for the mounts. > > -- > Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards > > Oliver Dzombic > IP-Interactive > > mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Anschrift: > > IP Interactive UG ( haftungsbeschraenkt ) > Zum Sonnenberg 1-3 > 63571 Gelnhausen > > HRB 93402 beim Amtsgericht Hanau > Geschäftsführung: Oliver Dzombic > > Steuer Nr.: 35 236 3622 1 > UST ID: DE274086107 > > > Am 29.04.2016 um 17:30 schrieb Edward Huyer: >> This is more of a "why" than a "can I/should I" question. >> >> The Ceph block device quickstart says (if I interpret it correctly) not to use a physical machine as both a Ceph RBD client and a node for hosting OSDs or other Ceph services. >> >> Is this interpretation correct? If so, what is the reasoning? If not, what is it actually saying? >> >> Thanks in advance. >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- Email: shinobu@xxxxxxxxx GitHub: shinobu-x Blog: Life with Distributed Computational System based on OpenSource _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |