Hi, bad idea :-) Its of course nice and important to drag developer towards a new/promising technology/software. But if the technology under the individual required specifications does not match, you will just risk to show this developer how worst this new/promising technology is. So you will just reach the opposite of what you want. So before you are doing something, usually big, like hadoop on an unstable software, maybe you should not use it. For the good of the developer, for your good and for the good of the reputation of the new/promising technology/software you wish. To force a pinguin to somehow live in the sahara, might be possible ( at least for some time ), but usually not a good idea ;-) -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards Oliver Dzombic IP-Interactive mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Anschrift: IP Interactive UG ( haftungsbeschraenkt ) Zum Sonnenberg 1-3 63571 Gelnhausen HRB 93402 beim Amtsgericht Hanau Geschäftsführung: Oliver Dzombic Steuer Nr.: 35 236 3622 1 UST ID: DE274086107 Am 28.04.2016 um 08:31 schrieb Bill Sharer: > Just got into a discussion today where I may have a chance to do work > with a db guy who wants hadoop and I want to steer him to it on cephfs. > While I'd really like to run gentoo with either infernalis or jewel > (when it becomes stable in portage), odds are more likely that I will be > required to use rhel/centos6.7 and thus stuck back at Hammer. Any > thoughts? > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |