Re: ceph striping

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 09:25:35 -0400 (EDT) Jason Dillaman wrote:

> In general, RBD "fancy" striping can help under certain workloads where
> small IO would normally be hitting the same object (e.g. small
> sequential IO). 
> 

While the above is very true (especially for single/few clients), I never
bothered to deploy fancy striping because you have to plan it very
carefully, as you can't change it later on.

For example if you start with 8 OSDs and set your striping accordingly (as
Alwin's example suggested) but later add more OSDs you won't be taking
full advantage of the IOPS availalbe.

Christian
-- 
Christian Balzer        Network/Systems Engineer                
chibi@xxxxxxx   	Global OnLine Japan/Rakuten Communications
http://www.gol.com/
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux