Re: Question about cache tier and backfill/recover

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:14:37 -0700 Bob R wrote:

> Mike,
> 
> Recovery would be based on placement groups and those degraded groups
> would only exist on the storage pool(s) rather than the cache tier in
> this scenario.
> 
Precisely.

They are entirely different entities.
There may be partially identical data (clean objects) in them, but that
will with near certainty never be enough for recovery/backfill operation.
Never mind that it would be akin to crossing the streams.

Christian

> Bob
> 
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Mike Miller <millermike287@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > in case of a failure in the storage tier, say single OSD disk failure
> > or complete system failure with several OSD disks, will the remaining
> > cache tier (on other nodes) be used for rapid backfilling/recovering
> > first until it is full? Or is backfill/recovery done directly to the
> > storage tier?
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> >
> > Mike
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list
> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> >


-- 
Christian Balzer        Network/Systems Engineer                
chibi@xxxxxxx   	Global OnLine Japan/Rakuten Communications
http://www.gol.com/
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux