On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Loic Dachary wrote:
> On 23/03/2016 01:12, Chris Dunlop wrote:
> > Hi Loïc,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:03:06AM +0100, Loic Dachary wrote:
> >> On 23/03/2016 00:39, Chris Dunlop wrote:
> >>> "The old OS'es" that were being supported up to v0.94.5 includes debian
> >>> wheezy. It would be quite surprising and unexpected to drop support for an
> >>> OS in the middle of a stable series.
> >>
> >> I'm unsure if wheezy is among the old OS'es. It predates my involvement in the stable releases effort. I know for sure el6 and 12.04 are supported for 0.94.x.
> >
> >>From http://download.ceph.com/debian-hammer/pool/main/c/ceph/
> >
> > ceph-common_0.94.1-1~bpo70+1_i386.deb 15-Dec-2015 15:32 10217628
> > ceph-common_0.94.3-1~bpo70+1_amd64.deb 19-Oct-2015 18:54 9818964
> > ceph-common_0.94.4-1~bpo70+1_amd64.deb 26-Oct-2015 20:48 9868020
> > ceph-common_0.94.5-1~bpo70+1_amd64.deb 15-Dec-2015 15:32 9868188
> >
> > That's all debian wheezy.
> >
> > (Huh. I'd never noticed 0.94.1 was i386 only!)
> >
>
> Indeed. Were these packages created as a lucky side effect or because
> there was a commitment at some point ? I'm curious to know the answer as
> well :-)
Wheezy was part of the official supported list for hammer (and still
should be). I think this was just an oversight for the last hammer
release, unless there is some infrastructure issues I haven't heard about.
There will be another hammer release before too long.
sage
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
