Yep, let me pull and build that branch. I tried installing the dbg packages and running it in gdb, but it didn't load the symbols. ---------------- Robert LeBlanc PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Robert LeBlanc wrote: >> Also, is this ceph_test_rados rewriting objects quickly? I think that >> the issue is with rewriting objects so if we can tailor the >> ceph_test_rados to do that, it might be easier to reproduce. > > It's doing lots of overwrites, yeah. > > I was albe to reproduce--thanks! It looks like it's specific to > hammer. The code was rewritten for jewel so it doesn't affect the > latest. The problem is that maybe_handle_cache may proxy the read and > also still try to handle the same request locally (if it doesn't trigger a > promote). > > Here's my proposed fix: > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/8187 > > Do you mind testing this branch? > > It doesn't appear to be directly related to flipping between writeback and > forward, although it may be that we are seeing two unrelated issues. I > seemed to be able to trigger it more easily when I flipped modes, but the > bug itself was a simple issue in the writeback mode logic. :/ > > Anyway, please see if this fixes it for you (esp with the RBD workload). > > Thanks! > sage > > > > >> ---------------- >> Robert LeBlanc >> PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Robert LeBlanc <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > I'll miss the Ceph community as well. There was a few things I really >> > wanted to work in with Ceph. >> > >> > I got this: >> > >> > update_object_version oid 13 v 1166 (ObjNum 1028 snap 0 seq_num 1028) >> > dirty exists >> > 1038: left oid 13 (ObjNum 1028 snap 0 seq_num 1028) >> > 1040: finishing write tid 1 to nodez23350-256 >> > 1040: finishing write tid 2 to nodez23350-256 >> > 1040: finishing write tid 3 to nodez23350-256 >> > 1040: finishing write tid 4 to nodez23350-256 >> > 1040: finishing write tid 6 to nodez23350-256 >> > 1035: done (4 left) >> > 1037: done (3 left) >> > 1038: done (2 left) >> > 1043: read oid 430 snap -1 >> > 1043: expect (ObjNum 429 snap 0 seq_num 429) >> > 1040: finishing write tid 7 to nodez23350-256 >> > update_object_version oid 256 v 661 (ObjNum 1029 snap 0 seq_num 1029) >> > dirty exists >> > 1040: left oid 256 (ObjNum 1029 snap 0 seq_num 1029) >> > 1042: expect (ObjNum 664 snap 0 seq_num 664) >> > 1043: Error: oid 430 read returned error code -2 >> > ./test/osd/RadosModel.h: In function 'virtual void >> > ReadOp::_finish(TestOp::CallbackInfo*)' thread 7fa1bf7fe700 time >> > 2016-03-17 10:47:19.085414 >> > ./test/osd/RadosModel.h: 1109: FAILED assert(0) >> > ceph version 0.94.6 (e832001feaf8c176593e0325c8298e3f16dfb403) >> > 1: (ceph::__ceph_assert_fail(char const*, char const*, int, char >> > const*)+0x76) [0x4db956] >> > 2: (ReadOp::_finish(TestOp::CallbackInfo*)+0xec) [0x4c959c] >> > 3: (()+0x9791d) [0x7fa1d472191d] >> > 4: (()+0x72519) [0x7fa1d46fc519] >> > 5: (()+0x13c178) [0x7fa1d47c6178] >> > 6: (()+0x80a4) [0x7fa1d425a0a4] >> > 7: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7fa1d2bd504d] >> > NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is >> > needed to interpret this. >> > terminate called after throwing an instance of 'ceph::FailedAssertion' >> > Aborted >> > >> > I had to toggle writeback/forward and min_read_recency_for_promote a >> > few times to get it, but I don't know if it is because I only have one >> > job running. Even with six jobs running, it is not easy to trigger >> > with ceph_test_rados, but it is very instant in the RBD VMs. >> > >> > Here are the six run crashes (I have about the last 2000 lines of each >> > if needed): >> > >> > nodev: >> > update_object_version oid 1015 v 1255 (ObjNum 1014 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1014) dirty exists >> > 1015: left oid 1015 (ObjNum 1014 snap 0 seq_num 1014) >> > 1016: finishing write tid 1 to nodev21799-1016 >> > 1016: finishing write tid 2 to nodev21799-1016 >> > 1016: finishing write tid 3 to nodev21799-1016 >> > 1016: finishing write tid 4 to nodev21799-1016 >> > 1016: finishing write tid 6 to nodev21799-1016 >> > 1016: finishing write tid 7 to nodev21799-1016 >> > update_object_version oid 1016 v 1957 (ObjNum 1015 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1015) dirty exists >> > 1016: left oid 1016 (ObjNum 1015 snap 0 seq_num 1015) >> > 1017: finishing write tid 1 to nodev21799-1017 >> > 1017: finishing write tid 2 to nodev21799-1017 >> > 1017: finishing write tid 3 to nodev21799-1017 >> > 1017: finishing write tid 5 to nodev21799-1017 >> > 1017: finishing write tid 6 to nodev21799-1017 >> > update_object_version oid 1017 v 1010 (ObjNum 1016 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1016) dirty exists >> > 1017: left oid 1017 (ObjNum 1016 snap 0 seq_num 1016) >> > 1018: finishing write tid 1 to nodev21799-1018 >> > 1018: finishing write tid 2 to nodev21799-1018 >> > 1018: finishing write tid 3 to nodev21799-1018 >> > 1018: finishing write tid 4 to nodev21799-1018 >> > 1018: finishing write tid 6 to nodev21799-1018 >> > 1018: finishing write tid 7 to nodev21799-1018 >> > update_object_version oid 1018 v 1093 (ObjNum 1017 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1017) dirty exists >> > 1018: left oid 1018 (ObjNum 1017 snap 0 seq_num 1017) >> > 1019: finishing write tid 1 to nodev21799-1019 >> > 1019: finishing write tid 2 to nodev21799-1019 >> > 1019: finishing write tid 3 to nodev21799-1019 >> > 1019: finishing write tid 5 to nodev21799-1019 >> > 1019: finishing write tid 6 to nodev21799-1019 >> > update_object_version oid 1019 v 462 (ObjNum 1018 snap 0 seq_num 1018) >> > dirty exists >> > 1019: left oid 1019 (ObjNum 1018 snap 0 seq_num 1018) >> > 1021: finishing write tid 1 to nodev21799-1021 >> > 1020: finishing write tid 1 to nodev21799-1020 >> > 1020: finishing write tid 2 to nodev21799-1020 >> > 1020: finishing write tid 3 to nodev21799-1020 >> > 1020: finishing write tid 5 to nodev21799-1020 >> > 1020: finishing write tid 6 to nodev21799-1020 >> > update_object_version oid 1020 v 1287 (ObjNum 1019 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1019) dirty exists >> > 1020: left oid 1020 (ObjNum 1019 snap 0 seq_num 1019) >> > 1021: finishing write tid 2 to nodev21799-1021 >> > 1021: finishing write tid 3 to nodev21799-1021 >> > 1021: finishing write tid 5 to nodev21799-1021 >> > 1021: finishing write tid 6 to nodev21799-1021 >> > update_object_version oid 1021 v 1077 (ObjNum 1020 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1020) dirty exists >> > 1021: left oid 1021 (ObjNum 1020 snap 0 seq_num 1020) >> > 1022: finishing write tid 1 to nodev21799-1022 >> > 1022: finishing write tid 2 to nodev21799-1022 >> > 1022: finishing write tid 3 to nodev21799-1022 >> > 1022: finishing write tid 5 to nodev21799-1022 >> > 1022: finishing write tid 6 to nodev21799-1022 >> > update_object_version oid 1022 v 1213 (ObjNum 1021 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1021) dirty exists >> > 1022: left oid 1022 (ObjNum 1021 snap 0 seq_num 1021) >> > 1023: finishing write tid 1 to nodev21799-1023 >> > 1023: finishing write tid 2 to nodev21799-1023 >> > 1023: finishing write tid 3 to nodev21799-1023 >> > 1023: finishing write tid 5 to nodev21799-1023 >> > 1023: finishing write tid 6 to nodev21799-1023 >> > update_object_version oid 1023 v 2612 (ObjNum 1022 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1022) dirty exists >> > 1023: left oid 1023 (ObjNum 1022 snap 0 seq_num 1022) >> > 1024: finishing write tid 1 to nodev21799-1024 >> > 1025: Error: oid 219 read returned error code -2 >> > ./test/osd/RadosModel.h: In function 'virtual void >> > ReadOp::_finish(TestOp::CallbackInfo*)' thread 7f0df8a16700 time >> > 2016-03-17 10:53:43.493575 >> > ./test/osd/RadosModel.h: 1109: FAILED assert(0) >> > ceph version 0.94.6 (e832001feaf8c176593e0325c8298e3f16dfb403) >> > 1: (ceph::__ceph_assert_fail(char const*, char const*, int, char >> > const*)+0x76) [0x4db956] >> > 2: (ReadOp::_finish(TestOp::CallbackInfo*)+0xec) [0x4c959c] >> > 3: (()+0x9791d) [0x7f0e015dd91d] >> > 4: (()+0x72519) [0x7f0e015b8519] >> > 5: (()+0x13c178) [0x7f0e01682178] >> > 6: (()+0x80a4) [0x7f0e011160a4] >> > 7: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7f0dffa9104d] >> > NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is >> > needed to interpret this. >> > terminate called after throwing an instance of 'ceph::FailedAssertion' >> > Aborted >> > >> > nodew: >> > 1117: expect (ObjNum 8 snap 0 seq_num 8) >> > 1120: expect (ObjNum 95 snap 0 seq_num 95) >> > 1121: expect (ObjNum 994 snap 0 seq_num 994) >> > 1113: expect (ObjNum 362 snap 0 seq_num 362) >> > 1118: expect (ObjNum 179 snap 0 seq_num 179) >> > 1115: expect (ObjNum 943 snap 0 seq_num 943) >> > 1119: expect (ObjNum 250 snap 0 seq_num 250) >> > 1124: finishing write tid 1 to nodew21820-361 >> > 1124: finishing write tid 2 to nodew21820-361 >> > 1124: finishing write tid 3 to nodew21820-361 >> > 1124: finishing write tid 4 to nodew21820-361 >> > 1124: finishing write tid 6 to nodew21820-361 >> > 1124: finishing write tid 7 to nodew21820-361 >> > update_object_version oid 361 v 892 (ObjNum 1061 snap 0 seq_num 1061) >> > dirty exists >> > 1124: left oid 361 (ObjNum 1061 snap 0 seq_num 1061) >> > 1125: finishing write tid 1 to nodew21820-486 >> > 1125: finishing write tid 2 to nodew21820-486 >> > 1125: finishing write tid 3 to nodew21820-486 >> > 1125: finishing write tid 5 to nodew21820-486 >> > 1125: finishing write tid 6 to nodew21820-486 >> > update_object_version oid 486 v 1317 (ObjNum 1062 snap 0 seq_num 1062) >> > dirty exists >> > 1125: left oid 486 (ObjNum 1062 snap 0 seq_num 1062) >> > 1126: expect (ObjNum 289 snap 0 seq_num 289) >> > 1127: finishing write tid 1 to nodew21820-765 >> > 1127: finishing write tid 2 to nodew21820-765 >> > 1127: finishing write tid 3 to nodew21820-765 >> > 1127: finishing write tid 5 to nodew21820-765 >> > 1127: finishing write tid 6 to nodew21820-765 >> > update_object_version oid 765 v 1156 (ObjNum 1063 snap 0 seq_num 1063) >> > dirty exists >> > 1127: left oid 765 (ObjNum 1063 snap 0 seq_num 1063) >> > 1128: finishing write tid 1 to nodew21820-40 >> > 1128: finishing write tid 2 to nodew21820-40 >> > 1128: finishing write tid 3 to nodew21820-40 >> > 1128: finishing write tid 5 to nodew21820-40 >> > 1128: finishing write tid 6 to nodew21820-40 >> > update_object_version oid 40 v 876 (ObjNum 1064 snap 0 seq_num 1064) >> > dirty exists >> > 1128: left oid 40 (ObjNum 1064 snap 0 seq_num 1064) >> > 1129: expect (ObjNum 616 snap 0 seq_num 616) >> > 1110: done (14 left) >> > 1113: done (13 left) >> > 1115: done (12 left) >> > 1117: done (11 left) >> > 1118: done (10 left) >> > 1119: done (9 left) >> > 1120: done (8 left) >> > 1121: done (7 left) >> > 1124: done (6 left) >> > 1125: done (5 left) >> > 1126: done (4 left) >> > 1127: done (3 left) >> > 1128: done (2 left) >> > 1129: done (1 left) >> > 1131: read oid 29 snap -1 >> > 1131: expect (ObjNum 28 snap 0 seq_num 28) >> > 1132: read oid 764 snap -1 >> > 1132: expect (ObjNum 763 snap 0 seq_num 763) >> > 1133: read oid 469 snap -1 >> > 1133: expect (ObjNum 468 snap 0 seq_num 468) >> > 1134: write oid 243 current snap is 0 >> > 1134: seq_num 1065 ranges >> > {483354=596553,1514502=531232,2509844=632287,3283353=1} >> > 1134: writing nodew21820-243 from 483354 to 1079907 tid 1 >> > 1134: writing nodew21820-243 from 1514502 to 2045734 tid 2 >> > 1134: writing nodew21820-243 from 2509844 to 3142131 tid 3 >> > 1134: writing nodew21820-243 from 3283353 to 3283354 tid 4 >> > 1135: read oid 569 snap -1 >> > 1135: expect (ObjNum 568 snap 0 seq_num 568) >> > 1133: Error: oid 469 read returned error code -2 >> > ./test/osd/RadosModel.h: In function 'virtual void >> > ReadOp::_finish(TestOp::CallbackInfo*)' thread 7fae71d03700 time >> > 2016-03-17 11:00:02.124951 >> > ./test/osd/RadosModel.h: 1109: FAILED assert(0) >> > ceph version 0.94.6 (e832001feaf8c176593e0325c8298e3f16dfb403) >> > 1: (ceph::__ceph_assert_fail(char const*, char const*, int, char >> > const*)+0x76) [0x4db956] >> > 2: (ReadOp::_finish(TestOp::CallbackInfo*)+0xec) [0x4c959c] >> > 3: (()+0x9791d) [0x7fae7a8ca91d] >> > 4: (()+0x72519) [0x7fae7a8a5519] >> > 5: (()+0x13c178) [0x7fae7a96f178] >> > 6: (()+0x80a4) [0x7fae7a4030a4] >> > 7: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7fae78d7e04d] >> > NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is >> > needed to interpret this. >> > terminate called after throwing an instance of 'ceph::FailedAssertion' >> > Aborted >> > >> > nodex: >> > >> > 1024: finishing write tid 1 to nodex22014-1024 >> > 1025: expect (ObjNum 75 snap 0 seq_num 75) >> > 1024: finishing write tid 2 to nodex22014-1024 >> > 1024: finishing write tid 3 to nodex22014-1024 >> > 1024: finishing write tid 5 to nodex22014-1024 >> > 1024: finishing write tid 6 to nodex22014-1024 >> > update_object_version oid 1024 v 753 (ObjNum 1023 snap 0 seq_num 1023) >> > dirty exists >> > 1024: left oid 1024 (ObjNum 1023 snap 0 seq_num 1023) >> > 982: done (44 left) >> > 983: done (43 left) >> > 984: done (42 left) >> > 985: done (41 left) >> > 986: done (40 left) >> > 987: done (39 left) >> > 988: done (38 left) >> > 989: done (37 left) >> > 990: done (36 left) >> > 991: done (35 left) >> > 992: done (34 left) >> > 993: done (33 left) >> > 994: done (32 left) >> > 995: done (31 left) >> > 996: done (30 left) >> > 997: done (29 left) >> > 998: done (28 left) >> > 999: done (27 left) >> > 1000: done (26 left) >> > 1001: done (25 left) >> > 1002: done (24 left) >> > 1003: done (23 left) >> > 1004: done (22 left) >> > 1005: done (21 left) >> > 1006: done (20 left) >> > 1007: done (19 left) >> > 1008: done (18 left) >> > 1009: done (17 left) >> > 1010: done (16 left) >> > 1011: done (15 left) >> > 1012: done (14 left) >> > 1013: done (13 left) >> > 1014: done (12 left) >> > 1015: done (11 left) >> > 1016: done (10 left) >> > 1017: done (9 left) >> > 1018: done (8 left) >> > 1019: done (7 left) >> > 1020: done (6 left) >> > 1021: done (5 left) >> > 1022: done (4 left) >> > 1023: done (3 left) >> > 1024: done (2 left) >> > 1025: done (1 left) >> > 1026: done (0 left) >> > 1027: delete oid 101 current snap is 0 >> > 1027: done (0 left) >> > 1028: read oid 156 snap -1 >> > 1028: expect (ObjNum 155 snap 0 seq_num 155) >> > 1029: read oid 691 snap -1 >> > 1029: expect (ObjNum 690 snap 0 seq_num 690) >> > 1030: read oid 282 snap -1 >> > 1030: expect (ObjNum 281 snap 0 seq_num 281) >> > 1031: read oid 979 snap -1 >> > 1031: expect (ObjNum 978 snap 0 seq_num 978) >> > 1032: read oid 203 snap -1 >> > 1032: expect (ObjNum 202 snap 0 seq_num 202) >> > 1033: setattr oid 464 current snap is 0 >> > 1032: Error: oid 203 read returned error code -2 >> > ./test/osd/RadosModel.h: In function 'virtual void >> > ReadOp::_finish(TestOp::CallbackInfo*)' thread 7fafee64a700 time >> > 2016-03-17 10:53:44.291343 >> > ./test/osd/RadosModel.h: 1109: FAILED assert(0) >> > ceph version 0.94.6 (e832001feaf8c176593e0325c8298e3f16dfb403) >> > 1: (ceph::__ceph_assert_fail(char const*, char const*, int, char >> > const*)+0x76) [0x4db956] >> > 2: (ReadOp::_finish(TestOp::CallbackInfo*)+0xec) [0x4c959c] >> > 3: (()+0x9791d) [0x7faff721191d] >> > 4: (()+0x72519) [0x7faff71ec519] >> > 5: (()+0x13c178) [0x7faff72b6178] >> > 6: (()+0x80a4) [0x7faff6d4a0a4] >> > 7: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7faff56c504d] >> > NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is >> > needed to interpret this. >> > terminate called after throwing an instance of 'ceph::FailedAssertion' >> > Aborted >> > >> > nodey: >> > >> > 974: done (52 left) >> > 975: done (51 left) >> > 976: done (50 left) >> > 977: done (49 left) >> > 978: done (48 left) >> > 979: done (47 left) >> > 980: done (46 left) >> > 981: done (45 left) >> > 982: done (44 left) >> > 983: done (43 left) >> > 984: done (42 left) >> > 985: done (41 left) >> > 986: done (40 left) >> > 987: done (39 left) >> > 988: done (38 left) >> > 989: done (37 left) >> > 990: done (36 left) >> > 991: done (35 left) >> > 992: done (34 left) >> > 993: done (33 left) >> > 994: done (32 left) >> > 995: done (31 left) >> > 996: done (30 left) >> > 997: done (29 left) >> > 998: done (28 left) >> > 999: done (27 left) >> > 1000: done (26 left) >> > 1001: done (25 left) >> > 1002: done (24 left) >> > 1003: done (23 left) >> > 1004: done (22 left) >> > 1005: done (21 left) >> > 1006: done (20 left) >> > 1007: done (19 left) >> > 1008: done (18 left) >> > 1009: done (17 left) >> > 1010: done (16 left) >> > 1011: done (15 left) >> > 1012: done (14 left) >> > 1013: done (13 left) >> > 1014: done (12 left) >> > 1015: done (11 left) >> > 1016: done (10 left) >> > 1017: done (9 left) >> > 1018: done (8 left) >> > 1019: done (7 left) >> > 1020: done (6 left) >> > 1021: done (5 left) >> > 1022: done (4 left) >> > 1023: done (3 left) >> > 1024: done (2 left) >> > 1025: done (1 left) >> > 1026: done (0 left) >> > 1027: delete oid 101 current snap is 0 >> > 1027: done (0 left) >> > 1028: read oid 156 snap -1 >> > 1028: expect (ObjNum 155 snap 0 seq_num 155) >> > 1029: read oid 691 snap -1 >> > 1029: expect (ObjNum 690 snap 0 seq_num 690) >> > 1030: read oid 282 snap -1 >> > 1030: expect (ObjNum 281 snap 0 seq_num 281) >> > 1031: read oid 979 snap -1 >> > 1031: expect (ObjNum 978 snap 0 seq_num 978) >> > 1032: read oid 203 snap -1 >> > 1032: expect (ObjNum 202 snap 0 seq_num 202) >> > 1033: setattr oid 464 current snap is 0 >> > 1028: Error: oid 156 read returned error code -2 >> > ./test/osd/RadosModel.h: In function 'virtual void >> > ReadOp::_finish(TestOp::CallbackInfo*)' thread 7f55fa3c6700 time >> > 2016-03-17 10:53:57.082571 >> > ./test/osd/RadosModel.h: 1109: FAILED assert(0) >> > ceph version 0.94.6 (e832001feaf8c176593e0325c8298e3f16dfb403) >> > 1: (ceph::__ceph_assert_fail(char const*, char const*, int, char >> > const*)+0x76) [0x4db956] >> > 2: (ReadOp::_finish(TestOp::CallbackInfo*)+0xec) [0x4c959c] >> > 3: (()+0x9791d) [0x7f5602f8d91d] >> > 4: (()+0x72519) [0x7f5602f68519] >> > 5: (()+0x13c178) [0x7f5603032178] >> > 6: (()+0x80a4) [0x7f5602ac60a4] >> > 7: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7f560144104d] >> > NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is >> > needed to interpret this. >> > terminate called after throwing an instance of 'ceph::FailedAssertion' >> > Aborted >> > >> > nodez: >> > >> > 1014: done (11 left) >> > 1026: delete oid 717 current snap is 0 >> > 1015: finishing write tid 2 to nodez24249-1015 >> > 1015: finishing write tid 4 to nodez24249-1015 >> > 1015: finishing write tid 5 to nodez24249-1015 >> > update_object_version oid 1015 v 3003 (ObjNum 1014 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1014) dirty exists >> > 1015: left oid 1015 (ObjNum 1014 snap 0 seq_num 1014) >> > 1016: finishing write tid 1 to nodez24249-1016 >> > 1016: finishing write tid 2 to nodez24249-1016 >> > 1016: finishing write tid 3 to nodez24249-1016 >> > 1016: finishing write tid 4 to nodez24249-1016 >> > 1016: finishing write tid 6 to nodez24249-1016 >> > 1016: finishing write tid 7 to nodez24249-1016 >> > update_object_version oid 1016 v 1201 (ObjNum 1015 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1015) dirty exists >> > 1016: left oid 1016 (ObjNum 1015 snap 0 seq_num 1015) >> > 1017: finishing write tid 1 to nodez24249-1017 >> > 1017: finishing write tid 2 to nodez24249-1017 >> > 1017: finishing write tid 3 to nodez24249-1017 >> > 1017: finishing write tid 5 to nodez24249-1017 >> > 1017: finishing write tid 6 to nodez24249-1017 >> > update_object_version oid 1017 v 3007 (ObjNum 1016 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1016) dirty exists >> > 1017: left oid 1017 (ObjNum 1016 snap 0 seq_num 1016) >> > 1018: finishing write tid 1 to nodez24249-1018 >> > 1018: finishing write tid 2 to nodez24249-1018 >> > 1018: finishing write tid 3 to nodez24249-1018 >> > 1018: finishing write tid 4 to nodez24249-1018 >> > 1018: finishing write tid 6 to nodez24249-1018 >> > 1018: finishing write tid 7 to nodez24249-1018 >> > update_object_version oid 1018 v 1283 (ObjNum 1017 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1017) dirty exists >> > 1018: left oid 1018 (ObjNum 1017 snap 0 seq_num 1017) >> > 1019: finishing write tid 1 to nodez24249-1019 >> > 1019: finishing write tid 2 to nodez24249-1019 >> > 1019: finishing write tid 3 to nodez24249-1019 >> > 1019: finishing write tid 5 to nodez24249-1019 >> > 1019: finishing write tid 6 to nodez24249-1019 >> > update_object_version oid 1019 v 999 (ObjNum 1018 snap 0 seq_num 1018) >> > dirty exists >> > 1019: left oid 1019 (ObjNum 1018 snap 0 seq_num 1018) >> > 1020: finishing write tid 1 to nodez24249-1020 >> > 1020: finishing write tid 2 to nodez24249-1020 >> > 1020: finishing write tid 3 to nodez24249-1020 >> > 1020: finishing write tid 5 to nodez24249-1020 >> > 1020: finishing write tid 6 to nodez24249-1020 >> > update_object_version oid 1020 v 813 (ObjNum 1019 snap 0 seq_num 1019) >> > dirty exists >> > 1020: left oid 1020 (ObjNum 1019 snap 0 seq_num 1019) >> > 1021: finishing write tid 1 to nodez24249-1021 >> > 1021: finishing write tid 2 to nodez24249-1021 >> > 1021: finishing write tid 3 to nodez24249-1021 >> > 1021: finishing write tid 5 to nodez24249-1021 >> > 1021: finishing write tid 6 to nodez24249-1021 >> > update_object_version oid 1021 v 1038 (ObjNum 1020 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1020) dirty exists >> > 1021: left oid 1021 (ObjNum 1020 snap 0 seq_num 1020) >> > 1022: finishing write tid 1 to nodez24249-1022 >> > 1022: finishing write tid 2 to nodez24249-1022 >> > 1022: finishing write tid 3 to nodez24249-1022 >> > 1022: finishing write tid 5 to nodez24249-1022 >> > 1022: finishing write tid 6 to nodez24249-1022 >> > update_object_version oid 1022 v 781 (ObjNum 1021 snap 0 seq_num 1021) >> > dirty exists >> > 1022: left oid 1022 (ObjNum 1021 snap 0 seq_num 1021) >> > 1023: finishing write tid 1 to nodez24249-1023 >> > 1023: finishing write tid 2 to nodez24249-1023 >> > 1023: finishing write tid 3 to nodez24249-1023 >> > 1023: finishing write tid 5 to nodez24249-1023 >> > 1023: finishing write tid 6 to nodez24249-1023 >> > update_object_version oid 1023 v 1537 (ObjNum 1022 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1022) dirty exists >> > 1023: left oid 1023 (ObjNum 1022 snap 0 seq_num 1022) >> > 1024: finishing write tid 1 to nodez24249-1024 >> > 1025: Error: oid 230 read returned error code -2 >> > ./test/osd/RadosModel.h: In function 'virtual void >> > ReadOp::_finish(TestOp::CallbackInfo*)' thread 7fd9bb7fe700 time >> > 2016-03-17 10:53:41.757921 >> > ./test/osd/RadosModel.h: 1109: FAILED assert(0) >> > ceph version 0.94.6 (e832001feaf8c176593e0325c8298e3f16dfb403) >> > 1: (ceph::__ceph_assert_fail(char const*, char const*, int, char >> > const*)+0x76) [0x4db956] >> > 2: (ReadOp::_finish(TestOp::CallbackInfo*)+0xec) [0x4c959c] >> > 3: (()+0x9791d) [0x7fd9d088d91d] >> > 4: (()+0x72519) [0x7fd9d0868519] >> > 5: (()+0x13c178) [0x7fd9d0932178] >> > 6: (()+0x80a4) [0x7fd9d03c60a4] >> > 7: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7fd9ced4104d] >> > NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is >> > needed to interpret this. >> > terminate called after throwing an instance of 'ceph::FailedAssertion' >> > Aborted >> > >> > nodezz: >> > >> > 1015: finishing write tid 1 to nodezz25161-1015 >> > 1015: finishing write tid 2 to nodezz25161-1015 >> > 1015: finishing write tid 4 to nodezz25161-1015 >> > 1015: finishing write tid 5 to nodezz25161-1015 >> > update_object_version oid 1015 v 900 (ObjNum 1014 snap 0 seq_num 1014) >> > dirty exists >> > 1015: left oid 1015 (ObjNum 1014 snap 0 seq_num 1014) >> > 1016: finishing write tid 1 to nodezz25161-1016 >> > 1016: finishing write tid 2 to nodezz25161-1016 >> > 1016: finishing write tid 3 to nodezz25161-1016 >> > 1016: finishing write tid 4 to nodezz25161-1016 >> > 1016: finishing write tid 6 to nodezz25161-1016 >> > 1016: finishing write tid 7 to nodezz25161-1016 >> > update_object_version oid 1016 v 1021 (ObjNum 1015 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1015) dirty exists >> > 1016: left oid 1016 (ObjNum 1015 snap 0 seq_num 1015) >> > 1017: finishing write tid 1 to nodezz25161-1017 >> > 1017: finishing write tid 2 to nodezz25161-1017 >> > 1017: finishing write tid 3 to nodezz25161-1017 >> > 1017: finishing write tid 5 to nodezz25161-1017 >> > 1017: finishing write tid 6 to nodezz25161-1017 >> > update_object_version oid 1017 v 3011 (ObjNum 1016 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1016) dirty exists >> > 1017: left oid 1017 (ObjNum 1016 snap 0 seq_num 1016) >> > 1018: finishing write tid 1 to nodezz25161-1018 >> > 1018: finishing write tid 2 to nodezz25161-1018 >> > 1018: finishing write tid 3 to nodezz25161-1018 >> > 1018: finishing write tid 4 to nodezz25161-1018 >> > 1018: finishing write tid 6 to nodezz25161-1018 >> > 1018: finishing write tid 7 to nodezz25161-1018 >> > update_object_version oid 1018 v 1099 (ObjNum 1017 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1017) dirty exists >> > 1018: left oid 1018 (ObjNum 1017 snap 0 seq_num 1017) >> > 1019: finishing write tid 1 to nodezz25161-1019 >> > 1019: finishing write tid 2 to nodezz25161-1019 >> > 1019: finishing write tid 3 to nodezz25161-1019 >> > 1019: finishing write tid 5 to nodezz25161-1019 >> > 1019: finishing write tid 6 to nodezz25161-1019 >> > update_object_version oid 1019 v 1300 (ObjNum 1018 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1018) dirty exists >> > 1019: left oid 1019 (ObjNum 1018 snap 0 seq_num 1018) >> > 1020: finishing write tid 1 to nodezz25161-1020 >> > 1020: finishing write tid 2 to nodezz25161-1020 >> > 1020: finishing write tid 3 to nodezz25161-1020 >> > 1020: finishing write tid 5 to nodezz25161-1020 >> > 1020: finishing write tid 6 to nodezz25161-1020 >> > update_object_version oid 1020 v 1324 (ObjNum 1019 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1019) dirty exists >> > 1020: left oid 1020 (ObjNum 1019 snap 0 seq_num 1019) >> > 1021: finishing write tid 1 to nodezz25161-1021 >> > 1021: finishing write tid 2 to nodezz25161-1021 >> > 1021: finishing write tid 3 to nodezz25161-1021 >> > 1021: finishing write tid 5 to nodezz25161-1021 >> > 1021: finishing write tid 6 to nodezz25161-1021 >> > update_object_version oid 1021 v 890 (ObjNum 1020 snap 0 seq_num 1020) >> > dirty exists >> > 1021: left oid 1021 (ObjNum 1020 snap 0 seq_num 1020) >> > 1022: finishing write tid 1 to nodezz25161-1022 >> > 1022: finishing write tid 2 to nodezz25161-1022 >> > 1022: finishing write tid 3 to nodezz25161-1022 >> > 1022: finishing write tid 5 to nodezz25161-1022 >> > 1022: finishing write tid 6 to nodezz25161-1022 >> > update_object_version oid 1022 v 464 (ObjNum 1021 snap 0 seq_num 1021) >> > dirty exists >> > 1022: left oid 1022 (ObjNum 1021 snap 0 seq_num 1021) >> > 1023: finishing write tid 1 to nodezz25161-1023 >> > 1023: finishing write tid 2 to nodezz25161-1023 >> > 1023: finishing write tid 3 to nodezz25161-1023 >> > 1023: finishing write tid 5 to nodezz25161-1023 >> > 1023: finishing write tid 6 to nodezz25161-1023 >> > update_object_version oid 1023 v 1516 (ObjNum 1022 snap 0 seq_num >> > 1022) dirty exists >> > 1023: left oid 1023 (ObjNum 1022 snap 0 seq_num 1022) >> > 1024: finishing write tid 1 to nodezz25161-1024 >> > 1024: finishing write tid 2 to nodezz25161-1024 >> > 1025: Error: oid 219 read returned error code -2 >> > ./test/osd/RadosModel.h: In function 'virtual void >> > ReadOp::_finish(TestOp::CallbackInfo*)' thread 7fbb1bfff700 time >> > 2016-03-17 10:53:53.071338 >> > ./test/osd/RadosModel.h: 1109: FAILED assert(0) >> > ceph version 0.94.6 (e832001feaf8c176593e0325c8298e3f16dfb403) >> > 1: (ceph::__ceph_assert_fail(char const*, char const*, int, char >> > const*)+0x76) [0x4db956] >> > 2: (ReadOp::_finish(TestOp::CallbackInfo*)+0xec) [0x4c959c] >> > 3: (()+0x9791d) [0x7fbb30ff191d] >> > 4: (()+0x72519) [0x7fbb30fcc519] >> > 5: (()+0x13c178) [0x7fbb31096178] >> > 6: (()+0x80a4) [0x7fbb30b2a0a4] >> > 7: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7fbb2f4a504d] >> > NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is >> > needed to interpret this. >> > terminate called after throwing an instance of 'ceph::FailedAssertion' >> > Aborted >> > ---------------- >> > Robert LeBlanc >> > PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Robert LeBlanc wrote: >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> >>> Hash: SHA256 >> >>> >> >>> I'm having trouble finding documentation about using ceph_test_rados. Can I >> >>> run this on the existing cluster and will that provide useful info? It seems >> >>> running it in the build will not have the caching set up (vstart.sh). >> >>> >> >>> I have accepted a job with another company and only have until Wednesday to >> >>> help with getting information about this bug. My new job will not be using C >> >>> eph, so I won't be able to provide any additional info after Tuesday. I want >> >>> to leave the company on a good trajectory for upgrading, so any input you c >> >>> an provide will be helpful. >> >> >> >> I'm sorry to hear it! You'll be missed. :) >> >> >> >>> I've found: >> >>> >> >>> ./ceph_test_rados --op read 100 --op write 100 --op delete 50 >> >>> - --max-ops 400000 --objects 1024 --max-in-flight 64 --size 4000000 >> >>> - --min-stride-size 400000 --max-stride-size 800000 --max-seconds 600 >> >>> - --op copy_from 50 --op snap_create 50 --op snap_remove 50 --op >> >>> rollback 50 --op setattr 25 --op rmattr 25 --pool unique_pool_0 >> >>> >> >>> Is that enough if I change --pool to the cached pool and do the toggling whi >> >>> le ceph_test_rados is running? I think this will run for 10 minutes. >> >> >> >> Precisely. You can probably drop copy_from and snap ops from the list >> >> since your workload wasn't exercising those. >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> sage >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |