Do you mind giving the full failed logs somewhere in fpaste.org along with some os version details?
There are some known issues on RHEL, If you use 'osd prepare' and 'osd activate'(specifying just the journal partition here) it might work better.
There are some known issues on RHEL, If you use 'osd prepare' and 'osd activate'(specifying just the journal partition here) it might work better.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Stephen Lord <Steve.Lord@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not multipath if you mean using the multipath driver, just trying to setup OSDs which use a data disk and a journal ssd. If I run just a disk based OSD and only specify one device to ceph-deploy then it usually works although sometimes has to retry. In the case where I am using it to carve an SSD into several partitions for journals it fails on the second one.
Steve
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.ceph.com_listinfo.cgi_ceph-2Dusers-2Dceph.com&d=CwICAg&c=8S5idjlO_n28Ko3lg6lskTMwneSC-WqZ5EBTEEvDlkg&r=tA8AXp6f2QAGtnc-TrB3H1XZIqqTELvv3S6ZQGJZBLs&m=xCs2lM8j21CKCDOMzMG9A39MKnroKXExLDI0-FgCPkA&s=yZ89WNI7wA8agL8i7CODARX7K864Ewod22WMdbv82xw&e=
> On Mar 15, 2016, at 1:45 PM, Vasu Kulkarni <vakulkar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ceph-deploy suite and also selinux suite(which isn't merged yet) indirectly tests ceph-disk and has been run on Jewel as well. I guess the issue Stephen is seeing is on multipath device
> which I believe is a known issue.
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There's a ceph-disk suite from last August that Loïc set up, but based
> on the qa list it wasn't running for a while and isn't in great shape.
> :/ I know there are some CentOS7 boxes in the sepia lab but it might
> not be enough for a small and infrequently-run test to reliably get
> tested against them.
> -Greg
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Ben Hines <bhines@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > It seems like ceph-disk is often breaking on centos/redhat systems. Does it
> > have automated tests in the ceph release structure?
> >
> > -Ben
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Stephen Lord <Steve.Lord@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The ceph-disk (10.0.4 version) command seems to have problems operating on
> >> a Redhat 7 system, it uses the partprobe command unconditionally to update
> >> the partition table, I had to change this to partx -u to get past this.
> >>
> >> @@ -1321,13 +1321,13 @@
> >> processed, i.e. the 95-ceph-osd.rules actions and mode changes,
> >> group changes etc. are complete.
> >> """
> >> - LOG.debug('Calling partprobe on %s device %s', description, dev)
> >> + LOG.debug('Calling partx on %s device %s', description, dev)
> >> partprobe_ok = False
> >> error = 'unknown error'
> >> for i in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5):
> >> command_check_call(['udevadm', 'settle', '--timeout=600'])
> >> try:
> >> - _check_output(['partprobe', dev])
> >> + _check_output(['partx', '-u', dev])
> >> partprobe_ok = True
> >> break
> >> except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
> >>
> >>
> >> It really needs to be doing that conditional on the operating system
> >> version.
> >>
> >> Steve
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> The information contained in this transmission may be confidential. Any
> >> disclosure, copying, or further distribution of confidential information is
> >> not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by
> >> Quantum. Quantum reserves the right to have electronic communications,
> >> including email and attachments, sent across its networks filtered through
> >> anti virus and spam software programs and retain such messages in order to
> >> comply with applicable data security and retention requirements. Quantum is
> >> not responsible for the proper and complete transmission of the substance of
> >> this communication or for any delay in its receipt.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ceph-users mailing list
> >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list
> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
