Sure, here it is:
# ceph osd tree
ID WEIGHT TYPE NAME UP/DOWN REWEIGHT PRIMARY-AFFINITY
-1 0.04997 root default
-2 0.04997 host ceph01
0 0.00999 osd.0 up 1.00000 1.00000
1 0.00999 osd.1 down 0 1.00000
3 0.00999 osd.3 up 1.00000 1.00000
4 0.00999 osd.4 down 0 1.00000
2 0.00999 osd.2 down 0 1.00000
root@ceph01:~# ceph osd df
ID WEIGHT REWEIGHT SIZE USE AVAIL %USE VAR
0 0.00999 1.00000 15348M 14920M 428M 97.21 1.00
1 0.00999 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0.00999 1.00000 15348M 14918M 430M 97.19 1.00
4 0.00999 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 0.00999 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 30697M 29839M 858M 97.20
MIN/MAX VAR: 0/1.00 STDDEV: 0.01
root@ceph01:~# ceph df
GLOBAL:
SIZE AVAIL RAW USED %RAW USED
30697M 858M 29839M 97.20
POOLS:
NAME ID USED %USED MAX AVAIL OBJECTS
rbd 0 15360M 50.04 1070M 3842
And the size(replicas) of the pool is 2, min_size is 1
------------------
hzwulibin
2016-03-10
-------------------------------------------------------------
发件人：Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu.kj@xxxxxxxxx>
发送日期：2016-03-10 11:28
收件人：hzwulibin
抄送：ceph-devel,ceph-users
主题：Re: New added OSD always down when full flag of osdmap
is set
Can you provide us with:
sudo ceph osd tree
sudo ceph osd df
sudo ceph df
Cheers,
S
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:58 AM, hzwulibin <hzwulibin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No, just 98%.
>
> Another scene, if backfill too full, also could not add the osd in and up.
>
> ------------------
> hzwulibin
> 2016-03-10
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> 发件人：Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu.kj@xxxxxxxxx>
> 发送日期：2016-03-10 10:49
> 收件人：hzwulibin
> 抄送：ceph-devel,ceph-users
> 主题：Re: New added OSD always down when full flag of osdmap
> is set
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:37 AM, hzwulibin <hzwulibin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi, cephers
>>
>> Recently, i found we could not add new osd in cluster when the full flag is set in osdmap.
>>
>> Shortly describe the scene here:
>> 1. Some osd are full, and the osdmap has full flag
>
> Are those OSDs usage really 100% which is not expected?
>
>> 2. Add new osd
>> 3. New osd service is running, but it's state always down
>>
>> Here is the issue:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15025
>>
>> Anyone know it's a normal way or a bug here?
>>
>> --------------
>> hzwulibin
>> 2016-03-10
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
>
> --
> Email:
> shinobu@xxxxxxxxx
> GitHub:
> shinobu-x
> Blog:
> Life with Distributed Computational System based on OpenSource
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
--
Email:
shinobu@xxxxxxxxx
GitHub:
shinobu-x
Blog:
Life with Distributed Computational System based on OpenSource
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
