Hi Dan, On 02/03/2016 19:48, Dan van der Ster wrote: > Hi Loic, > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> On 02/03/2016 17:15, Odintsov Vladislav wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> it looks very strange, that LTS release suddenly stopped support of one of OS'es in the middle of lifecycle. Especially when there are no technical problems. >>> How can we help community with building hammer branch officially? >>> >> >> Hi, >> >> I think you misread what Sage wrote : "The intention was to continue building stable releases (0.94.x) on the old list of supported platforms (which inclues 12.04 and el6)". In other words, the old OS'es are still supported. Their absence is a glitch in the release process that will be fixed. >> > > BTW, has there been any discussion to do 0.94.7 on a shorter interval? > There is at least one unfortunate regression in .6: > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14873 It's an incentive to have 0.94.7, indeed. It could be released this month, should Sage decide it's worth it. Cheers > > Cheers, Dan > > >> Cheers >> >>> ________________________________ >>> Regards, >>> >>> Vladislav Odintsov >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: ceph-users <ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Chris Dunlop <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 04:06 >>> To: Sage Weil >>> Cc: Loic Dachary; ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ceph-users@xxxxxxxx >>> Subject: Re: v0.94.6 Hammer released >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The "old list of supported platforms" includes debian wheezy. >>> Will v0.94.6 be built for this? >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:57:53AM -0500, Sage Weil wrote: >>>> The intention was to continue building stable releases (0.94.x) on the old >>>> list of supported platforms (which inclues 12.04 and el6). I think it was >>>> just an oversight that they weren't built this time around. I the >>>> overhead to doing so is just keeping a 12.04 and el6 jenkins build slave >>>> around. >>>> >>>> Doing this builds in the existing environment sounds much better than >>>> trying to pull in externally built binaries... >>>> >>>> sage >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com