Bug in rados bench with 0.94.6 (regression, not present in 0.94.5)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On my crappy test cluster (Debian Jessie, Hammer 0.94.6) I'm seeing rados
bench crashing doing "seq" runs. 
As I'm testing cache tiers at the moment I also tried it with a normal,
replicated pool with the same result.

After creating some benchmark objects with:
---
rados -p data bench 20 write -t 32 --no-cleanup
---

A consecutive run of this ends in tears:
---
# rados -p data bench 10 seq -t 32 
   sec Cur ops   started  finished  avg MB/s  cur MB/s  last lat   avg lat
     0       0         0         0         0         0         -         0
rados: ./common/Mutex.h:96: void Mutex::_pre_unlock(): Assertion `nlock > 0' failed.
*** Caught signal (Aborted) **
 in thread 7f1894100780
 ceph version 0.94.6 (e832001feaf8c176593e0325c8298e3f16dfb403)
 1: rados() [0x4e5e23]
 2: (()+0xf8d0) [0x7f18915268d0]
 3: (gsignal()+0x37) [0x7f188fde6067]
 4: (abort()+0x148) [0x7f188fde7448]
 5: (()+0x2e266) [0x7f188fddf266]
 6: (()+0x2e312) [0x7f188fddf312]
 7: (Mutex::Unlock()+0xb3) [0x4fda93]
 8: (ObjBencher::seq_read_bench(int, int, int, int, bool)+0x127c) [0x4da37c]
 9: (ObjBencher::aio_bench(int, int, int, int, int, bool, char const*, bool)+0x2df) [0x4ded8f]
 10: (main()+0xa664) [0x4be834]
 11: (__libc_start_main()+0xf5) [0x7f188fdd2b45]
 12: rados() [0x4c2c97]
2016-02-26 14:18:52.641052 7f1894100780 -1 *** Caught signal (Aborted) **
 in thread 7f1894100780
---

There's nothing particular outstanding or malicious in the recent events,
here are the last 2:
---
    -2> 2016-02-26 14:23:12.439214 7f18c113f780  1 -- 10.0.0.83:0/877189211 --> 10.0.0.85:6804/2921 -- osd_op(client.31691145.0:34 benchmark_data_engtest03_32406_object32 [read 0~4096] 0.def1bb6e ack+read+known_if_redirected e11724) v5 -- ?+0 0x39090d0 con 0x389bed0
    -1> 2016-02-26 14:23:12.439930 7f18b4549700  1 -- 10.0.0.83:0/877189211 <== osd.11 10.0.0.34:6802/2973 1 ==== osd_op_reply(9 benchmark_data_engtest03_32406_object7 [read 0~4096] v0'0 uv15 ondisk = 0) v6 ==== 205+0+4096 (2792458300 0 1108541644) 0x7f1864000ca0 con 0x38bbf80
---

Note that "rand" works fine, as does "seq" on a 0.95.5 cluster. 

While certainly not production related (or so one hopes!), this cinches it
for me, no upgrade to .6 tomorrow on the mission critical cluster.

Also created a tracker issue, despite resounding success (none, it
probably was silently fixed ^o^) of my previous one:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14873

Christian
-- 
Christian Balzer        Network/Systems Engineer                
chibi@xxxxxxx   	Global OnLine Japan/Rakuten Communications
http://www.gol.com/
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux