Hi, am I right, that official 0.94.5 el6 was built here? http://gitbuilder.sepia.ceph.com/gitbuilder-ceph-rpm-centos6-5-amd64-basic/log.cgi?log=9764da52395923e0b32908d83a9f7304401fee43 If yes, it seems like hammer autobuild was broken more than one month ago (11th of Jan there is a first failed build): http://gitbuilder.sepia.ceph.com/gitbuilder-ceph-rpm-centos6-5-amd64-basic/#origin/hammer Error "sudo: no tty present and no askpass program specified". Maybe there were changes in Jenkins? How is the build called? From Jenkins via ssh? Maybe, it should be called ssh -t? ________________________________ Regards, Vladislav Odintsov ________________________________________ From: ceph-users <ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Alfredo Deza <adeza@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 22:59 To: Udo Lembke Cc: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: v0.94.6 Hammer released On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Udo Lembke <ulembke@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > Am 24.02.2016 um 17:27 schrieb Alfredo Deza: >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Dan van der Ster <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Thanks Sage, looking forward to some scrub randomization. >>> >>> Were binaries built for el6? http://download.ceph.com/rpm-hammer/el6/x86_64/ >> >> We are no longer building binaries for el6. Just for Centos 7, Ubuntu >> Trusty, and Debian Jessie. >> > this means that our proxmox-ve server 3.4, which run debian wheezy, could not be updated from ceph 0.94.5 to 0.94.6! > The OSD-nodes run's wheezy too - they can be upgraded. But the MONs must be also upgraded (first). > > I can understand, that newer versions will not supplied to an older OS, but stop from minor.5 to minor.6 makes realy no > sense to me. > > Of course, I can update to proxmox-ve 4.x, which is jessie based, but in this case I have trouble with DRBD... It would be really nice if the community could step up to help us out in building binaries. Building Ceph is non-trivial and coming up with all the different distros, distro versions, and architectures (at some point we were close to 12 variations) is a tremendous effort. > > > Udo > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |