Hi - As per the OSD calculations: no of OSD * 100/pool size => 96 *100/3 = 3200 => 4096 So 4096 is correct pg_num. this case - PG are correct number as per the recommended. On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Ferhat Ozkasgarli <ozkasgarli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As message satates, you must increase placement group number for the pool. > Because 108T data require larger pg mumber. > > On Feb 3, 2016 8:09 PM, "M Ranga Swami Reddy" <swamireddy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am using ceph for my storage cluster and health shows as WARN state >> with too few pgs. >> >> == >> health HEALTH_WARN pool volumes has too few pgs >> == >> >> The volume pool has 4096 pgs >> -- >> ceph osd pool get volumes pg_num >> pg_num: 4096 >> --- >> >> and >> >ceph df >> NAME ID USED %USED MAX AVAIL >> OBJECTS >> volumes 4 2830G 0.82 108T >> 763509 >> -- >> >> How do we fix this, without downtime? >> >> Thanks >> Swami >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |